On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Andrew Hills wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> So if /lib is NOT a symlink, then all you should need is to delete all
>> the files in /usr/lib that are not owned by any package. Then you
>> should be able to upgrade.
>
> And if /lib
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:46:49 +0200
Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC
> wrote:
> > Right after much faffing about i now have the box back to
>
> So if /lib is NOT a symlink, then all you should need is to delete all
> the files in /usr/lib that are not owned by
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:09:18 +0200
Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Andrew Hills
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> >> So if /lib is NOT a symlink, then all you should need is to delete
> >> all the files in /usr/lib that are not owned by
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:46:49 +0200
> Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC
>> wrote:
>> > Right after much faffing about i now have the box back to
>>
>> So if /lib is NOT a symlink, then all you should need i
On 18-07-2012 08:09, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Andrew Hills wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>>> So if /lib is NOT a symlink, then all you should need is to delete all
>>> the files in /usr/lib that are not owned by any package. Then yo
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Mauro Santos
wrote:
> It's not in the wiki and I haven't seen it suggested but for really
> stubborn and possibly borked cases couldn't one boot from other media
> and tell pacman to update outside of the default path with --root,
> --cachedir, --config and --gpgd
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:22:53 +0200
Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:46:49 +0200
> > Tom Gundersen wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC
> >> wrote:
> >> > Right after much faffing about i now have the
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:24 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:22:53 +0200
> Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:46:49 +0200
>> > Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:19 AM, P .NIKOLIC
>>
Hi,
I am unable to get custom .cls files detected by the latex program.
I have a file "jbnotebook.cls" which works fine when it is placed in
the same directory as the the file main.tex. So, the file itself is
not a problem. Also,
[me@localhost]$ kpsewhich -var-value=TEXMFHOME
/home/jayesh/.l
pacman -Syu --ignore glibc
pacman -Su
I had the same problem, went to archlinux website and they say exactly what you
need to do and why. You shouldn't toy with it yourself, nor use the --force
option. Try this, if it doesn't work, they have an in-depth guide too.
Otherwise I cannot stress out m
On Wednesday 18 Jul 2012 16:34:49 you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am unable to get custom .cls files detected by the latex
program.
> I have a file "jbnotebook.cls" which works fine when it is placed
in
> the same directory as the the file main.tex. So, the file itself
is
> not a problem. Also,
>
>
Hi Everyone,
I'm playing with a custom kernel just for the fun of it, Everything
works fine except it's very noisy when it boots. I'm using the same
loglevel (4) as the default kernel that is in the Arch repo. And I have
turned off many debug options under kernel hacking section.
It does quiet dow
2012/7/17 Karol Babioch :
> This can (and to my opinion should) be changed, so you don't need to be
> root. See [1] for some examples for various programmers.
>
> First of all you should try to use the upstream package, which can be
> downloaded here [2]. It already contains the necessary tool cha
Am 18.07.2012 16:02, schrieb Sudaraka Wijesinghe:
Hi Everyone,
I'm playing with a custom kernel just for the fun of it, Everything
works fine except it's very noisy when it boots. I'm using the same
loglevel (4) as the default kernel that is in the Arch repo. And I have
turned off many debug opt
On 07/18/2012 08:32 PM, martin kalcher wrote:
> Am 18.07.2012 16:02, schrieb Sudaraka Wijesinghe:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I'm playing with a custom kernel just for the fun of it, Everything
>> works fine except it's very noisy when it boots. I'm using the same
>> loglevel (4) as the default kernel th
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Sudaraka Wijesinghe
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm playing with a custom kernel just for the fun of it, Everything
> works fine except it's very noisy when it boots. I'm using the same
> loglevel (4) as the default kernel that is in the Arch repo. And I have
> turne
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:27:57 -0400
Alex Belanger wrote:
> pacman -Syu --ignore glibc
> pacman -Su
> I had the same problem, went to archlinux website and they say
> exactly what you need to do and why. You shouldn't toy with it
> yourself, nor use the --force option. Try this, if it doesn't work,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:27:11 +0200
Tom Gundersen wrote:
Pruned
>
> You sholud delete the duplicate files from /usr/lib, did you do this?
> Then it _should_ work...
>
> -t
Hi Tom
Ok i will give it a whirl see what transpires
CheersPete
--
Linux 7-of-9 3.4.4-3-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue
> No, I'm using initscripts, and it does quiet down when I use the kernel
> command line parameter as explained in there, but I was wondering how
> default Arch kernel is doing it without the command line parameter.
It's a patch:
% grep -R loglevel /var/abs/core/linux
/var/abs/core/linux/change-de
Hello.
Just done an install using arch-install-scripts, and it wasn't so bad.
The only bad thing is that grub2 is not available. I busted my
installed system trying to install grub 2.0rc1 (wrong UUID in grub.cfg
file). I finally installed syslinux while trying to understand what
happened.
So, gre
On 07/18/2012 09:35 PM, Christoph Vigano wrote:
>> No, I'm using initscripts, and it does quiet down when I use the kernel
>> command line parameter as explained in there, but I was wondering how
>> default Arch kernel is doing it without the command line parameter.
>
> It's a patch:
> % grep -R l
To answer your question about installing GRUB2 by default using install
scripts, GRUB2 is now maintained incore, and legacy GRUB has been moved to AUR.
Therefore, by the next official iso release, GRUB2 should be a part of the
official install, and the install scripts will be updated to support
On 07/18/2012 07:30 PM, fredbezies wrote:
Hello.
Just done an install using arch-install-scripts, and it wasn't so bad.
The only bad thing is that grub2 is not available. I busted my
installed system trying to install grub 2.0rc1 (wrong UUID in grub.cfg
file). I finally installed syslinux while
Am 18.07.2012 18:30, schrieb fredbezies:
> Hello.
>
> Just done an install using arch-install-scripts, and it wasn't so bad.
> The only bad thing is that grub2 is not available. I busted my
> installed system trying to install grub 2.0rc1 (wrong UUID in grub.cfg
> file). I finally installed syslin
2012/7/18 Kyle :
> To answer your question about installing GRUB2 by default using install
> scripts, GRUB2 is now maintained >incore, and legacy GRUB has been moved to
> AUR. Therefore, by the next official iso release, GRUB2 should >be a part of
> the official install, and the install scripts
[...]
>
> grub 2 is currently in testing. Once this moves to core and grub1 will
> get removed from the repo we will include it for the next iso.
Great. Because installing grub2 by hand is kinda hellish. It is why I
used archboot on my last real install :)
--
Frederic Bezies
fredbez...@gmail.com
On 07/17/2012 07:33 AM, Martin Cigorraga wrote:
Me too, I was waiting for this to try Trinity on a single-core Pentium 4 /
1.25gb RAM :)
It will run great! I have fresh (post usrlib) i686 packages that can be
tested, I just need somewhere to host them.
The only fixes I have yet to do is upd
I am planning a test install using the new arch-install-scripts via
the latest netinstall images from releng (from today's date).
I know that for a system where I blow away all previous disc
partitions and partition from scratch I can create a 2MiB partition
(using MBR and NOT GPT partitioning) be
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:40 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> I am planning a test install using the new arch-install-scripts via
> the latest netinstall images from releng (from today's date).
>
> I know that for a system where I blow away all previous disc
> partitions and partition from scratch I can
On 07/17/2012 08:31 PM, Calvin Morrison wrote:
Doesn't Trinity use artsd for it's audio output for events and such? I
would start looking there.
Calvin
Yes, it uses arts, but with kcontrol -> Sound System -> autodetect I want it
to use the Arch default and work right out of the box. That mean
On 07/18/2012 12:46 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:40 PM, mike cloaked
> wrote:
>> I am planning a test install using the new arch-install-scripts via the
>> latest netinstall images from releng (from today's date).
>>
>> I know that for a system where I blow away all previou
Oops, sorry for the current misinformation. I didn't realize that GRUB2 was
still in testing and hadn't yet been moved to core. I've been keeping up with
the list, but my Arch box is currently dead, and won't be revived until I can
rebuild it. I somehow thought that the package had been moved al
I need to take a look at the wiki. I'm currently doing everything on a phone,
because my computer is dead and needs to be rebuilt. However, the Arch wiki has
been my main source of Arch and general Linux related documentation for some
time now. I do agree that the wiki page for the install scrip
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:44 PM, fredbezies wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> grub 2 is currently in testing. Once this moves to core and grub1 will
>> get removed from the repo we will include it for the next iso.
>
> Great. Because installing grub2 by hand is kinda hellish. It is why I
> used archboot on my
2012/7/18 C Anthony Risinger :
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:44 PM, fredbezies wrote:
>> [...]
>>>
>>> grub 2 is currently in testing. Once this moves to core and grub1 will
>>> get removed from the repo we will include it for the next iso.
>>
>> Great. Because installing grub2 by hand is kinda hel
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Matthew Monaco wrote:
> On 07/18/2012 12:46 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:40 PM, mike cloaked
>> wrote:
>>> I am planning a test install using the new arch-install-scripts via the
>>> latest netinstall images from releng (from today's date).
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:27:11 +0200
Tom Gundersen wrote:
Pruned
>
> You sholud delete the duplicate files from /usr/lib, did you do this?
> Then it _should_ work...
>
> -t
Hi Tom
Well word on the street is it seems to have worked at last
now i have another problem cropped up for which i wil
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:40 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
> I am planning a test install using the new arch-install-scripts via
> the latest netinstall images from releng (from today's date).
>
> I know that for a system where I blow away all previous disc
> partitions and partition from scratch I can
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 21:40:07 +0300
The Touch <01tto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I force updated glib and now I've got an awesome kernel panic! :)
> switch_root: failed to execute /sbin/init: no such file or directory
>
> any ideas on how to fix this?
> Thanks in advance!
Boot install image, mount stu
Hi folks .
Well having finally got the Glibc thing sorted and done a "pacman
-Syu" which pulled in kernel ect when i try to start Kaffeine it
takes almost 2 mins to finally show up , When started from an xterm i
get the following errors
QDBusConnection: session D-Bus connection created be
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Kirill Churin wrote:
> What the fuck is wrong with you, guys? Why didn't you just read the manual?
> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html#BIOS-installation
>
> Arch follows upstream, you know?
>
Thank you for your polite reply! I have read the manua
mike cloaked, Wed 2012-07-18 @ 22:42:37+0100:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Kirill Churin
> wrote:
> > What the fuck is wrong with you, guys? Why didn't you just read the
> > manual?
> > http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html#BIOS-installation
> >
> > Arch follows upstream, you k
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 3:42 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Kirill Churin
> wrote:
>
>> What the fuck is wrong with you, guys? Why didn't you just read the manual?
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/grub.html#BIOS-installation
>>
>> Arch follows upstream, you
mike cloaked on Wed, 2012/07/18 19:40:
> I am planning a test install using the new arch-install-scripts via
> the latest netinstall images from releng (from today's date).
>
> I know that for a system where I blow away all previous disc
> partitions and partition from scratch I can create a 2MiB
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Taylor Hedberg wrote:
> Just ignore the troll. There are a few people on this list who seem to
> take offense at the fact that people ask questions about Arch Linux...on
> a list for asking questions about Arch Linux. It's one thing if you had
> made no effort to
last time I installed arch on a virtual machine, I was unable to install grub2.
one google search later I put the mbr gap of 2MiB back in place and everything
went smoothly. 2MiB isn't much by today's standards, and if the software says
it needs it, why not just give it? if you find a way to avoid
** Jayesh Badwaik [2012-07-18 16:34:49 +0530]:
> Hi,
> I am unable to get custom .cls files detected by the latex program.
> I have a file "jbnotebook.cls" which works fine when it is placed in
> the same directory as the the file main.tex. So, the file itself is
> not a problem. Also,
> [me
** Jayesh Badwaik [2012-07-18 16:34:49 +0530]:
> Hi,
> I am unable to get custom .cls files detected by the latex program.
> I have a file "jbnotebook.cls" which works fine when it is placed in
> the same directory as the the file main.tex. So, the file itself is
> not a problem. Also,
> [me
48 matches
Mail list logo
