[arch-general] Removing unused locales?

2010-12-29 Thread Nicolás Reynolds
Hi, it occurred to me today to check how much disk space /usr/share/locale was using on my system. Turned out to be 449.43M, though I only use en and es locales, which are in the code in the first case and ~13M in the second. Would it make sense to remove the extra ones? I mean, I don't think anyo

Re: [arch-general] Removing unused locales?

2010-12-29 Thread Thomas Bahn
Am Mittwoch 29 Dezember 2010, 20:10:19 schrieb Nicolás Reynolds: > Hi, it occurred to me today to check how much disk space /usr/share/locale > was using on my system. Turned out to be 449.43M, though I only use en and > es locales, which are in the code in the first case and ~13M in the > second.

Re: [arch-general] Removing unused locales?

2010-12-29 Thread Nicolás Reynolds
El 29/12/10 08:23, Thomas Bahn dijo: > Am Mittwoch 29 Dezember 2010, 20:10:19 schrieb Nicolás Reynolds: > > Hi, it occurred to me today to check how much disk space /usr/share/locale > > was using on my system. Turned out to be 449.43M, though I only use en and > > es locales, which are in the code

Re: [arch-general] Removing unused locales?

2010-12-29 Thread Martín Cigorraga
You can also try Bleachbit from AUR, a complete cleaner for your system. 2010/12/29, Nicolás Reynolds : > El 29/12/10 08:23, Thomas Bahn dijo: >> Am Mittwoch 29 Dezember 2010, 20:10:19 schrieb Nicolás Reynolds: >> > Hi, it occurred to me today to check how much disk space >> > /usr/share/locale >>

Re: [arch-general] [core/filesystem 2010.10-1 -> 2010.12-1] breaks makepkg and firefox

2010-12-29 Thread Martín Cigorraga
> Works for me. > What are your /tmp permissions after installing the filesystem package? > That's where the <<< used in lines 268 and 272 will be creating a > temporary file with random name. > It's odd that it would be returning an errno=0 instead of EPERM, though. > > Hi Linas, First of all, sor

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Breaking the unspoken rule: AUR helper in [community]

2010-12-29 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:38:34 +0800 schrieb Ray Rashif : > We didn't even conclude a previous discussion [1] (if we did then it's > all in the negative), and now there is one of those tools in the > repositories? Honestly, I don't think this is fair practice as it > undermines the initiatives of ot