Hi guys,
bump to latest bugfix version.
Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17538 # added blktrace
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17106 # finally added CONFIG_MMIOTRACE
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17696 # fixed intel wireless
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17687
Hi guys,
latest bugfix release.
Please signoff for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 01/08/2010 09:01 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
Frederic Bezies wrote:
Hello everybody.
Yesterday, my computer installed from testing last networkmanager
version, 0.7.998-1. It worked OK until I shut down my computer.
This morning, I cannot get any single program to be launched in gnome,
even xterm
Ionut Biru wrote:
On 01/08/2010 09:01 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
Frederic Bezies wrote:
Hello everybody.
Yesterday, my computer installed from testing last networkmanager
version, 0.7.998-1. It worked OK until I shut down my computer.
This morning, I cannot get any single program to be launched i
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 18:54 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> Ionut Biru wrote:
> > On 01/08/2010 09:01 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> >> Frederic Bezies wrote:
> >>> Hello everybody.
> >>>
> >>> Yesterday, my computer installed from testing last networkmanager
> >>> version, 0.7.998-1. It worked OK until I sh
On Friday 08 January 2010 03:54:23 Allan McRae wrote:
> Ionut Biru wrote:
> > On 01/08/2010 09:01 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> >> Frederic Bezies wrote:
> >>> Hello everybody.
> >>>
> >>> Yesterday, my computer installed from testing last networkmanager
> >>> version, 0.7.998-1. It worked OK until I sh
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
>
> FYI
> I was having trouble with networking several years ago and had a /etc/host
> like yours. I posted to usenet and the network gurus there promptly busted me
> for that layout.
>
> They told me to do this instead:
>
> #
> 127.0.0.1
Can someone remove libpthread-stubs from packages svn/trunk?
The package obviously was removed from the repos a long time ago
and tools like pbget would fetch an outdated PKGBUILD.
Am 08.01.2010 17:24, schrieb a...@nezmer.info:
> Can someone remove libpthread-stubs from packages svn/trunk?
> The package obviously was removed from the repos a long time ago
> and tools like pbget would fetch an outdated PKGBUILD.
While you may be right, such tools must be able to handle packag
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 08.01.2010 17:24, schrieb a...@nezmer.info:
>> Can someone remove libpthread-stubs from packages svn/trunk?
>> The package obviously was removed from the repos a long time ago
>> and tools like pbget would fetch an outdated PKGBUILD.
>
> W
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17011
[gimageview] segfaults
This package hasn't been updated since 2004 and segfaults. The bug
report explains this well.
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 18:11 +0100, Xavier wrote:
> Why doesn't Arch ship that package ? It's a single 6 lines file, it
> cannot hurt anything.
> I just realized arch patches libdrm to not require it :
> http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/libdrm/repos/extra-i686/no-pthread-stubs.patch
> But of
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 06:11:40PM +0100, Xavier wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> > Am 08.01.2010 17:24, schrieb a...@nezmer.info:
> >> Can someone remove libpthread-stubs from packages svn/trunk?
> >> The package obviously was removed from the repos a long time ago
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 18:11 +0100, Xavier wrote:
>> Why doesn't Arch ship that package ? It's a single 6 lines file, it
>> cannot hurt anything.
>> I just realized arch patches libdrm to not require it :
>> http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packa
On Friday 08 January 2010 10:23:20 Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Baho Utot
wrote:
> > FYI
> > I was having trouble with networking several years ago and had a
> > /etc/host like yours. I posted to usenet and the network gurus there
> > promptly busted me for that lay
signoff x86_64
On 01/08/2010 02:06 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi guys,
bump to latest bugfix version.
Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17538 # added blktrace
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17106 # finally added CONFIG_MMIOTRACE
http://bugs.archlinux.org/tas
hi List,
I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
I looked at the wiki re the various methods of upgrading the driver:
[r...@laptop pkg]# vbox_build_module
Building vboxdrv for Linux 2.6.32-ARCH
make[1]: Entering directory `/opt/VirtualBox/src/vboxdrv'
for f in . linux r0drv
Hi,
I'm glad the .32 kernel comes with the new firewire stack, so i can
finally use dvgrab (http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=79856)
well.. that's what i thought.
this kernel does not recognize my pci firewire card with the via vt6306
chipset.
(running all latest packages from core, not te
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:47 PM, richard terry wrote:
> hi List,
>
> I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
Install kernel26-headers (a new package) as well.
Dude look that deps, depends=('libxmu' 'gcc' 'make' 'kernel26-headers')
You need kernel26-headers, some issues about new kernel series [1].
And some comments about that (virtualbox bin) in [2].
[1] http://www.archlinux.org/news/477/
[2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9753
--
Leandro
On Saturday 09 January 2010 08:56:13 Ray Kohler wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:47 PM, richard terry wrote:
> > hi List,
> >
> > I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
>
> Install kernel26-headers (a new package) as well.
>
kernel26-2.6.32.2-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz
kernel-heade
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:10 PM, richard terry wrote:
> On Saturday 09 January 2010 08:56:13 Ray Kohler wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:47 PM, richard terry wrote:
>> > hi List,
>> >
>> > I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
>>
>> Install kernel26-headers (a new package)
On Saturday 09 January 2010 08:56:13 Ray Kohler wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:47 PM, richard terry wrote:
> > hi List,
> >
> > I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
>
> Install kernel26-headers (a new package) as well.
>
Thank you so much to both Ray and Leandro , all
On 01/08/2010 03:47 PM, richard terry wrote:
> hi List,
>
> I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
>
> I looked at the wiki re the various methods of upgrading the driver:
>
> [r...@laptop pkg]# vbox_build_module
> Building vboxdrv for Linux 2.6.32-ARCH
> make[1]: Entering
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 16:59, Jan de Groot wrote:
> I just created a todo list containing 163 packages. This todo list
> contains all packages that link to libpng and that should get rebuilt
> when we update to libpng 1.4.0.
What is the new soname? I'd like to make a list for arch-games as well.
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 à 17:44 -0600, David C. Rankin a écrit :
> On 01/08/2010 03:47 PM, richard terry wrote:
> > hi List,
> >
> > I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
> >
> > I looked at the wiki re the various methods of upgrading the driver:
> >
> > [r...@laptop
On Friday 08 January 2010 19:18:46 Paul Ezvan wrote:
> Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 à 17:44 -0600, David C. Rankin a écrit :
> > On 01/08/2010 03:47 PM, richard terry wrote:
> > > hi List,
> > >
> > > I've upgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and virtual box dosn't work.
> > >
> > > I looked at the wiki re th
Hello, everyone,
I'm a freshman in ArchLinux. As my lab owns a printer connected to a
windows system, I need to connect it using cups.
I read the wiki guide and do as what is told. However, I always
receive this messge:
Connection failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME
My /etc/cups/pri
28 matches
Mail list logo
