[arch-general] Conflict with Mesa

2009-09-05 Thread Dario
Hi! Sorry if this has already been asked or if its solution is trivial. I got this conflict error from pacman -Syu: mesa: /usr/include/GL/glew.h è già presente nel filesystem mesa: /usr/include/GL/glxew.h è già presente nel filesystem mesa: /usr/include/GL/wglew.h è già presente nel filesystem

Re: [arch-general] Conflict with Mesa

2009-09-05 Thread Biru Ionut
Dario wrote: Hi! Sorry if this has already been asked or if its solution is trivial. I got this conflict error from pacman -Syu: mesa: /usr/include/GL/glew.h è già presente nel filesystem mesa: /usr/include/GL/glxew.h è già presente nel filesystem mesa: /usr/include/GL/wglew.h è già presente n

Re: [arch-general] Conflict with Mesa

2009-09-05 Thread Dario
Hi! In data sabato 05 settembre 2009 12:31:51, Biru Ionut ha scritto: > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15996 > > wait for a fix. Wow ultrafast answer. Thanks a lot!:) ciao! Carotinho Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com

Re: [arch-general] Conflict with Mesa

2009-09-05 Thread hollunder
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:40:21 +0200 Dario wrote: > Hi! > > In data sabato 05 settembre 2009 12:31:51, Biru Ionut ha scritto: > > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15996 > > > > wait for a fix. > > Wow ultrafast answer. Thanks a lot!:) > > ciao! > > Carotinho > Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in t

Re: [arch-general] Conflict with Mesa

2009-09-05 Thread Dario
Hi! > I had the same conflict but nothing depended on glew, no idea why it > was installed. That's one fix :) Here Glew is required by Koffice. ciao! Carotinho Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com

Re: [arch-general] split packages documentation

2009-09-05 Thread Ali H. Caliskan
Well I was referring to two packages with one PGKBUILD. Jan de Groot has come closer to that idea, see [1]. Although I think it shoule be a single pkgname field with pkg1, pkg1 names, and single pkgver, with pkgver1, pkgver2 etc. while the build section should have pkg1 pkg2, pkg3 etc. Observe tha

[arch-general] Request for hpacucli output from people running HP Smart Array controllers

2009-09-05 Thread RedShift
Hello all I'm gathering the output of the hpacucli program from as much configurations as possible. If you can find some free time for me, can you send me the output of: hpacucli ctrl all show detail hpacucli ctrl slot=1 show config hpacucli ctrl slot=1 array all show hpacucli ctrl slot=1 arr

Re: [arch-general] Conflict with Mesa

2009-09-05 Thread Jonathan Brown
I just added mesa to my ignore line in pacman.conf for now, so that I can get the rest of the updates... :) I'm sure most people have already thought of doing that, but for those that have not, maybe that will help.. From: Dario To: arch-general@archlinux.org S

Re: [arch-general] split packages documentation

2009-09-05 Thread Henning Garus
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 02:46:49PM +0200, Ali H. Caliskan wrote: > Well I was referring to two packages with one PGKBUILD. Jan de Groot has > come closer to that idea, see [1]. Although I think it shoule be a single > pkgname field with pkg1, pkg1 names, and single pkgver, with pkgver1, > pkgver2 e

Re: [arch-general] Conflict with Mesa

2009-09-05 Thread Biru Ionut
Jonathan Brown wrote: I just added mesa to my ignore line in pacman.conf for now, so that I can get the rest of the updates... :) I'm sure most people have already thought of doing that, but for those that have not, maybe that will help.. it should be fixed now mesa 7.5.1-2 -- Ionut

Re: [arch-general] split packages documentation

2009-09-05 Thread Ali H. Caliskan
Well, makepkg is script that I've studied, so it's capable of doing more than what it should. Here is an "bash" illustration of what PKGBUILD should look like according to my opinion: pkgname=('mesa', 'libgl', 'foopkg') pkgver=('7.5.1', '7.5.1', '1.2') pkgrel=2 pkgdesc=("Mesa 3-D graphics librari

Re: [arch-general] split packages documentation

2009-09-05 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 10:32, Ali H. Caliskan wrote: > depends=(('libgl' 'libx11>=1.2.2' >          'libxt' 'gcc-libs>=4.4.1' >          'dri2proto=2.1' 'libdrm>=2.4.13'), >         ('libdrm>=2.4.13' 'libxxf86vm>=1.0.99.1' >          'libxdamage>=1.1.1' 'expat>=2.0.1'), '') Bash can do array of ar

Re: [arch-general] split packages documentation

2009-09-05 Thread Ali H. Caliskan
Bash can handle array of arrays, dependening on how you implement it. I'm not that useful in that manner, since I've applied on python. On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Daenyth Blank > wrote: > On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 10:32, Ali H. Caliskan > wrote: > > depends=(('libgl' 'libx11>=1.2.2' > >

Re: [arch-general] split packages documentation

2009-09-05 Thread Allan McRae
Allan Cheers, and what that is supposed to achieve? also explain the separation of the build function into separate functions The depends array that you demonstrate does not work in bash. Can you This message also demonstrates why top posting is annoying... Hi, Ali H. Caliskan wrote: Well, ma

Re: [arch-general] split packages documentation

2009-09-05 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
According to On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:40:40 +0200 "Ali H. Caliskan" wrote: man bash > Bash can handle array of arrays, dependening on how you implement it. I'm > not that useful in that manner, since I've applied on python. > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Daenyth Blank > > > wrote: >

Re: [arch-general] split packages documentation

2009-09-05 Thread Ali H. Caliskan
Perhaps I should start posting topless then :) Well Allan, if you can't see the benefits of this, then I shouldn't bother mentioning the KISS philosophy. Also, for instance, compiling gcc and gcc-libs would reduce time and costs for the developers. and what that is supposed to achieve? > also expl

Re: [arch-general] Conflict with Mesa

2009-09-05 Thread marc[i1]
Le samedi 5 septembre 2009, Jonathan Brown a écrit : > I just added mesa to my ignore line in pacman.conf for now, so that I can > get the rest of the updates... :) # pacman -Syu --ignore libdrm for temporary problem, it may be the best way. -- + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + +

Re: [arch-general] split packages documentation

2009-09-05 Thread Allan McRae
Ali H. Caliskan wrote: Perhaps I should start posting topless then :) Well Allan, if you can't see the benefits of this, then I shouldn't bother mentioning the KISS philosophy. Also, for instance, compiling gcc and gcc-libs would reduce time and costs for the developers. Um... you need to e

Re: [arch-general] Conflict with Mesa

2009-09-05 Thread Jonathan Brown
yes that is better thank you - Original Message From: marc[i1] To: General Discusson about Arch Linux Sent: Saturday, September 5, 2009 10:59:36 AM Subject: Re: [arch-general] Conflict with Mesa Le samedi 5 septembre 2009, Jonathan Brown a écrit : > I just added mesa to my ignore lin

Re: [arch-general] Conflict with Mesa

2009-09-05 Thread Dario
In data sabato 05 settembre 2009 15:22:24, Biru Ionut ha scritto: > it should be fixed now mesa 7.5.1-2 Yes, it is! Nice job:) ciao! Dario Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com

Re: [arch-general] split packages documentation

2009-09-05 Thread Xavier
I did not understand 90% of what Ali H. Caliskan said, and I cannot understand how someone can keep top-posting after 3 different people asked him to comply to the bottom-posting rule, but well... I just wanted to say that the example he gave reminded me of frugalware's handling of split packages

[arch-general] Cannot upgrade system-config-printer.

2009-09-05 Thread Frederic Bezies
Hello. This morning (Paris Time), I wanted to upgrade my archlinux. So, I launched a little sudo pacman -Syu and here is what is happening : fred ~ $ sudo pacman -Syu Mot de passe : :: Synchronisation des bases de données de paquets... testing est à jour; core est à jour; extra est à jour; co

Re: [arch-general] Cannot upgrade system-config-printer.

2009-09-05 Thread occam
> 2) Because of kdeadmin-system-config-printer-kde and > kdeutils-printer-applet, system-config-printer-common cannot be installed. > > Do I have to open a bug ? Or is it already known ? > I have the same problem using a 100% standard arch64 setup.

Re: [arch-general] Cannot upgrade system-config-printer.

2009-09-05 Thread Panos Filip
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 8:21 AM, wrote: > > 2) Because of kdeadmin-system-config-printer-kde and > > kdeutils-printer-applet, system-config-printer-common cannot be > installed. > > > > Do I have to open a bug ? Or is it already known ? > > > I have the same problem using a 100% standard arch64 se