In my opinion, Arch is the best distro can really do bleeding edge with
stablility, thank devs for their excellent work. However due to some reasion
(saying shortage of time, man power, instersts etc), some applications
can't be updated in time. We can certainly flag it out of date in the web
page
You can just ping the pkg maintainer. Why make things complex.
2008/4/12, gan lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> In my opinion, Arch is the best distro can really do bleeding edge with
> stablility, thank devs for their excellent work. However due to some reasion
> (saying shortage of time, man power, in
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 20:24 -0500, Simo Leone wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 04:59:07PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > 2008/4/11 Ondřej Kučera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Interesting point. I checked up on it and it IS orphaned.
> > I'll CC the dev list to see if anyone is interested in it. If
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 6:26 PM, 王凯 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can just ping the pkg maintainer. Why make things complex.
>
> 2008/4/12, gan lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > In my opinion, Arch is the best distro can really do bleeding edge with
> > stablility, thank devs for their excellent
On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 17:31 +0800, gan lu wrote:
> In my opinion, Arch is the best distro can really do bleeding edge
> with stablility, thank devs for their excellent work. However due to
> some reasion (saying shortage of time, man power, instersts etc), some
> applications can't be updated in t
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:15:12 -0400 (EDT)
Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can remove:
> perl-compress-zlib
> perl-io-compress-base
> perl-io-compress-zlib
> perl-compress-raw-zlib
> as they are now provided by the perl package.
Yeah, thanks, this actually came to me while I was havi
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Ond?ej Ku?era wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:15:12 -0400 (EDT)
Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You can remove:
perl-compress-zlib
perl-io-compress-base
perl-io-compress-zlib
perl-compress-raw-zlib
as they are now provided by the perl package.
Yeah, thanks, this a
Eric Belanger a écrit :
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Ond?ej Ku?era wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:15:12 -0400 (EDT)
Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You can remove:
perl-compress-zlib
perl-io-compress-base
perl-io-compress-zlib
perl-compress-raw-zlib
as they are now provided by the perl packag
On Samstag, 12. April 2008 17:33 Jan de Groot wrote:
At first i don't want to create a bureaucratic monster.-)
> The first thing I stated isn't actually true though: we can unflag
> packages, which we'll certainly do when people think development
> versions of packages like GTK are newer than the
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Samstag, 12. April 2008 17:33 Jan de Groot wrote:
>
> At first i don't want to create a bureaucratic monster.-)
>
> > The first thing I stated isn't actually true though: we can unflag
> > packages, which we'll certainly do wh
> -bcprov is packaged
> -commons-cli isn't
> -neither is log4j
> -swt is at 3.3.x
> Azureus 3.0.5.0 needs swt 3.4 development version (3.4M6 is current). If we
> don't want to
> update swt to the development version, we're tied to the much older
> 3.0.4.2 release, which needs some additional patc
11 matches
Mail list logo
