On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:26:07 +0100
RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rodrigo Coacci wrote:
> > So have anyone got up and running with KDE4 on Arch? I know about kdemod
> > testing, but they miss some dependencies (tapioca-qt, strigi...), so to
> > do those by hand i'd prefer to do all myself
On 20 Jan 2008 20:09, JJDaNiMoTh wrote:
> http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/3174
> KDE 4.0 != KDE4 ... and devs of arch know it :)
This comment sums up the posting, which seems to be a bit
of magnet for those who want to point how untidy the 4.0
release was...
http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/3
On Jan 20, 2008 8:51 AM, Mark Constable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2008 20:09, JJDaNiMoTh wrote:
> > http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/3174
> > KDE 4.0 != KDE4 ... and devs of arch know it :)
>
> This comment sums up the posting, which seems to be a bit
> of magnet for those who want t
Il Saturday 19 January 2008 21:52:04 Rodrigo Coacci ha scritto:
> So have anyone got up and running with KDE4 on Arch? I know about kdemod
> testing, but they miss some dependencies (tapioca-qt, strigi...), so to do
> those by hand i'd prefer to do all myself :-P
> Also, any ideas on when we'll get
On Monday 21 January 2008 10:58:25 Rodrigo Coacci wrote:
> > I build it from source from svn using kdesvn-build,
> > a great tool you can find here
> > http://kdesvn-build.kde.org/
> > It's very simple to configure and It will build every
> > kde module you need installing it where you want. My
>
On Jan 20, 2008 7:03 PM, Federico Manganelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Il Saturday 19 January 2008 21:52:04 Rodrigo Coacci ha scritto:
> > So have anyone got up and running with KDE4 on Arch? I know about kdemod
> > testing, but they miss some dependencies (tapioca-qt, strigi...), so to
> do
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
