Re: [arch-general] qupzilla

2014-10-14 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 07:26 +0200, Jens Adam wrote: > it's already fixed in 1.8.2, see > https://github.com/QupZilla/qupzilla/commit/ef6842b9d7ed5ec29a3f44ada3b609254764f10f > (that diff -> first facepalm of the day) Ok

Re: [arch-general] qupzilla

2014-10-09 Thread Jens Adam
Easy, easy ... First - you don't lose anything, just rename the files back and you're good to go. Second - it's already fixed in 1.8.2, see https://github.com/QupZilla/qupzilla/commit/ef6842b9d7ed5ec29a3f44ada3b609254764f10f (that diff -> first facepalm of the day) --byte signature.asc Descrip

Re: [arch-general] qupzilla

2014-10-09 Thread Sadika Sumanapala
I don't think this is a good reason to remove Qupzilla from arch repositories. On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Jesus Balbastro wrote: > Excuse me. I have no say or authority on this, but that sounds like an > opinion. Maybe elaborate? I don't use this browser myself but if it has > deviated so

Re: [arch-general] qupzilla

2014-10-09 Thread Jesus Balbastro
Excuse me. I have no say or authority on this, but that sounds like an opinion. Maybe elaborate? I don't use this browser myself but if it has deviated so much from what you like im certain it has a good fork somewhere. On Thursday, October 9, 2014, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > https://www.archlinux.or