FWIW and thankfully, we're not all wired the same, and I can
say with certainty that I find htop irritating and confusing,
having used FreeBSD and procps top for decades. There is
a learning curve, I guess, or we're using/missing different
features.
But to return to the important point, does anyon
On 04/11/2018 04:36 PM, Leonid Isaev via arch-general wrote:
> It should also be mentioned that ~/.toprc is the most hideous config file on
> my
> system :) And FWIW, I don't think that upstream wanted to provoke any learning
> -- they just made a change for the sake of it (probably following GNOM
On 04/11/2018 04:20 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> It's ironic the configuration allowing the choice between the new/old
> interfaces isn't described clearly, or at all, in 'man top'. The Alternate
> Display 'A', has nothing whatsoever to do with whether modern top is display.
> From my read of the m
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:20:10PM -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 04/11/2018 12:08 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> > It's ironic, I guess, that the procps-ng developers did this in order to
> > provoke people into learning how to configure top, but now we have
> > people preferring t
On 04/11/2018 12:08 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> It's ironic, I guess, that the procps-ng developers did this in order to
> provoke people into learning how to configure top, but now we have
> people preferring the old look, who complain when the default changes,
> and then when we re
If I actually used top after discovering htop, I would prefer the old
look (which our new procps-ng maintainer has apparently made an
executive decision to use).
On 04/11/2018 12:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> The PKGBUILD change for rebuilds is simple, but we ought to have one or the
> other (mo
I haven't seen the modern top ui, but it sounds useful and I'd
be in favor of it if it doesn't break things.
But I have to note that terminal emulators and coloring curses
applications is very hard to do in a way that works across
everyone's favorite color scheme. It's bound to result in
invisible
On 04/10/2018 07:05 PM, Jonathon Fernyhough wrote:
> Much as I'm wary about raising this after last time... here goes. Really
> just putting this out there as a thing to consider if it's not already
> known about.
>
> With 3.3.13, upstream introduced support for a system-wide default
> toprc, /etc
8 matches
Mail list logo
