Em maio 8, 2017 18:15 Eli Schwartz via arch-general escreveu:
Why are you making such a circus out of this???
I ask you the same. Please stop replying to others using phrases in all
caps.
Thank you,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpJGIqylk_k5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general
wrote:
> On 05/08/2017 01:45 PM, Carsten Mattner wrote:
>> Is the idea that I create a machine local repo that has highest prio
>> and overrides arch extra/testing? Otherwise, I don't know how to unbreak
>> the cycle while only building
On 05/08/2017 01:45 PM, Carsten Mattner wrote:
> Is the idea that I create a machine local repo that has highest prio
> and overrides arch extra/testing? Otherwise, I don't know how to unbreak
> the cycle while only building a custom ffmpeg.
Granted that it is a moot point anyway since your initia
On Mon, 8 May 2017 13:15:31 -0600
Leonid Isaev wrote:
> I don't understand... testing/libx264 contains /usr/include/x264.h and doesn't
> depend on ffmpeg, no?
>
> Cheers,
There's been another reshuffle of the x264 packages. The "lib" packages were
just symlinks when this thread started.
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 05:45:09PM +, Carsten Mattner via arch-general
wrote:
> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general
> wrote:
> > On 05/07/2017 02:28 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Doug Newgard
> >> wrote:
> >>> And
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Eli Schwartz via arch-general
wrote:
> On 05/07/2017 02:28 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
>> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
>>> And again, the cycle doesn't matter at all if your ffmpeg package is set up
>>> correctly.
>>
>> I don'
On 05/07/2017 02:28 PM, Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
>> And again, the cycle doesn't matter at all if your ffmpeg package is set up
>> correctly.
>
> I don't understand how I can without additionally repacking libx264/x264,
> but ho
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2017 18:05:16 +
> Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
>
>> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
>> > So what? None of that should cause a problem if your custom
>> > ffmpeg package is done correctly.
>>
>>
On Sun, 7 May 2017 18:05:16 +
Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> > So what? None of that should cause a problem if your custom
> > ffmpeg package is done correctly.
>
> I have to override/repackage two packages now that x264.h i
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2017 16:36:43 +
> Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
>
>> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
>> > On Sun, 7 May 2017 14:51:08 +
>> > Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
>> >
>> >> For various r
On Sun, 7 May 2017 16:36:43 +
Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 May 2017 14:51:08 +
> > Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
> >
> >> For various reasons like missing features and wrong version
> >> I cannot
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Lin DasSarma <_...@umbc.edu> wrote:
> Carsten,
>
> What about a custom ffmpeg PKGBUILD instead?
That's what I've been doing which got complicated now that
x264.h is not in libx264 but x264 and x264 depends on ffmpeg
for presumably muxing.
We have more than two x264
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2017 14:51:08 +
> Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
>
>> For various reasons like missing features and wrong version
>> I cannot use arch's ffmpeg package and have to build my own
>> package, and this results in a cycli
On Sun, 7 May 2017 14:51:08 +
Carsten Mattner via arch-general wrote:
> For various reasons like missing features and wrong version
> I cannot use arch's ffmpeg package and have to build my own
> package, and this results in a cyclic dependency I cannot
> get out of.
What, exactly, is the is
Carsten,
What about a custom ffmpeg PKGBUILD instead?
Lin
On 7 May 2017 at 10:51, Carsten Mattner via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Since the libx264 package does not include /usr/include
> and it's in x264 now, and because x264 depends on ffmpeg,
> I cannot use libx264 wi
15 matches
Mail list logo
