Norbert Zeh [2012.08.03 1943 -0300]:
> gt [2012.08.03 1526 +0530]:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 10:15:33AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> > > > Probably the only people running Linux systems without cups are the
> > > > DIY distro groups (Arch
gt [2012.08.03 1526 +0530]:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 10:15:33AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> > > Probably the only people running Linux systems without cups are the
> > > DIY distro groups (Arch, gentoo etc.) as I don't think this would have
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 10:15:33AM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> > Probably the only people running Linux systems without cups are the
> > DIY distro groups (Arch, gentoo etc.) as I don't think this would have
> > been caught in the bigger distr
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Guillaume Brunerie
>> wrote:
>>> 2012/8/2 Ray Kohler :
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Scott Weisman wrote:
> I should have added more details. I
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Guillaume Brunerie
> wrote:
>> 2012/8/2 Ray Kohler :
>>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Scott Weisman wrote:
I should have added more details. I am using OpenBox on an X86_64 install.
Two dif
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Guillaume Brunerie
> wrote:
>> 2012/8/2 Ray Kohler :
>>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Scott Weisman wrote:
I should have added more details. I am using OpenBox on an X86_64 install.
Two dif
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Guillaume Brunerie
wrote:
> 2012/8/2 Ray Kohler :
>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Scott Weisman wrote:
>>> I should have added more details. I am using OpenBox on an X86_64 install.
>>>
>>> Two different systems (desktop and notebook) but otherwise largely simil
2012/8/2 Ray Kohler :
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Scott Weisman wrote:
>> I should have added more details. I am using OpenBox on an X86_64 install.
>>
>> Two different systems (desktop and notebook) but otherwise largely similar
>> setups.
>
> I'm also using Chromium in a pure Openbox envir
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Scott Weisman wrote:
> I should have added more details. I am using OpenBox on an X86_64 install.
>
> Two different systems (desktop and notebook) but otherwise largely similar
> setups.
I'm also using Chromium in a pure Openbox environment on x86_64, and I
don't s
I should have added more details. I am using OpenBox on an X86_64 install.
Two different systems (desktop and notebook) but otherwise largely similar
setups.
Scott
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Scott Weisman wrote:
> I started experiencing a severe problem with Chromium recently that makes
>
Running x86_64.
Using awesome, no problem showing the print dialog window here.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:57 PM, David Benfell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/01/2012 12:42 AM, Jeremiah Dodds wrote:
>> Scott Weisman writes:
>>>
>>> Has anyone else experienced th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/01/2012 12:42 AM, Jeremiah Dodds wrote:
> Scott Weisman writes:
>>
>> Has anyone else experienced this problem? Can anyone suggest a
>> solution?
>
> I had not, but I can confirm the behaviour with chromium
> 20.0.1132.57-2 on x86_64, running
Scott Weisman writes:
> I started experiencing a severe problem with Chromium recently that makes
> web browsing a very tedious experience.
>
> It took a while to narrow it down, but it seems that whenever the print
> dialog is invoked, either manually (eg ctrl-P on the keyboard) or by a page
> w
13 matches
Mail list logo
