Re: [arch-general] Yafray

2010-02-06 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2010/2/6, Andrea Scarpino : > Seems that no one is interested, move it to AUR or simply delete it. I will be moving it to the AUR. -- Arch Linux Developer http://www.archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.it

Re: [arch-general] Yafray

2010-02-06 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Thursday 04 February 2010 22:01:50 Giovanni Scafora wrote: > BTW, yafray isn't under development anymore, so or we move it to the > AUR or we leave it there... Seems that no one is interested, move it to AUR or simply delete it. -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

Re: [arch-general] Yafray

2010-02-05 Thread Matěj Týč
On 4 February 2010 22:56, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > On Thursday 04 February 2010 22:52:34 Matěj Týč wrote: >> That one is not true, Yafaray (note the added 'a', AFAIK Yafray does not >> exist any more) is actively developed and last website news are two >> weeks old. > But giovanni said that yafray

Re: [arch-general] Yafray

2010-02-05 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 05/02/2010, Giovanni Scafora wrote: >> 2010/2/4, Matěj Týč : >>> That one is not true, Yafaray (note the added 'a', AFAIK Yafray does not >>>  exist any more) is actively developed and last website news are two >>>  weeks old. >> >> I know, y

Re: [arch-general] Yafray

2010-02-05 Thread Ray Rashif
On 05/02/2010, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > 2010/2/4, Matěj Týč : >> That one is not true, Yafaray (note the added 'a', AFAIK Yafray does not >> exist any more) is actively developed and last website news are two >> weeks old. > > I know, yafaray is actively developed, but we have yafray in extra >

Re: [arch-general] Yafray

2010-02-04 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2010/2/4, Matěj Týč : > That one is not true, Yafaray (note the added 'a', AFAIK Yafray does not > exist any more) is actively developed and last website news are two > weeks old. I know, yafaray is actively developed, but we have yafray in extra repo, so I ask here to replace it with yafaray 0.

Re: [arch-general] Yafray

2010-02-04 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2010/2/4, Matěj Týč : > That one is not true, Yafaray (note the added 'a', AFAIK Yafray does not > exist any more) is actively developed and last website news are two > weeks old. > http://www.yafaray.org/ Please, read at http://www.yafaray.org/download "YafRay 0.0.9 sources. The last YafRay

Re: [arch-general] Yafray

2010-02-04 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Thursday 04 February 2010 22:52:34 Matěj Týč wrote: > That one is not true, Yafaray (note the added 'a', AFAIK Yafray does not > exist any more) is actively developed and last website news are two > weeks old. But giovanni said that yafray is not under developed and it is replaced by yafaray. H

Re: [arch-general] Yafray

2010-02-04 Thread Matěj Týč
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 22:01 +0100, Giovanni Scafora wrote: > 2010/2/4, Andrea Scarpino : > > if you will maintain it, do this. > > I will not maintain it. > BTW, yafray isn't under development anymore, so or we move it to the > AUR or we leave it there... That one is not true, Yafaray (note the a

Re: [arch-general] Yafray

2010-02-04 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Thursday 04 February 2010 22:01:50 Giovanni Scafora wrote: > I will not maintain it. > BTW, yafray isn't under development anymore, so or we move it to the > AUR or we leave it there... So, is there some DEV or TUs intersted to maintain yafaray? Or can we move it to AUR? -- Andrea `bash` Sca

Re: [arch-general] Yafray

2010-02-04 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2010/2/4, Andrea Scarpino : > if you will maintain it, do this. I will not maintain it. BTW, yafray isn't under development anymore, so or we move it to the AUR or we leave it there... If we want to leave it there, I guess that we will have to upgrade it to yafaray 0.1.1 (yafaray not yafray, it ha

Re: [arch-general] Yafray

2010-02-04 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Thursday 04 February 2010 21:17:11 Giovanni Scafora wrote: > Hi all, > > the last yafray release was the 0.0.9 version in Summer 2006. > Notice that these sources aren't under development anymore. > I would like replace it with yafaray 0.1.1. > What do you think about? if you will maintain it,