Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-06 Thread Joe(theWordy)Philbrook
It would appear that on Apr 6, Guus Snijders did say: > Op 6 apr. 2012 10:56 schreef "Martti Kühne" het > volgende: > > > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 08:10:59PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: > > > > > > Nothing should ever require you to disable automounting. The default > should > > > be not to mou

Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-06 Thread Guus Snijders
Op 6 apr. 2012 10:56 schreef "Martti Kühne" het volgende: > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 08:10:59PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: > > > > Nothing should ever require you to disable automounting. The default should > > be not to mount new devices, anything else sounds like a bug to me. > > > -1 I agree

Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-06 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 20:10:59 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote: > > Nothing should ever require you to disable automounting. The default > should be not to mount new devices, anything else sounds like a bug > to me. -1 Pete . -- Linux 7-of-9 3.2.13-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Mar 24 09:10:39 CET 201

Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-06 Thread Martti Kühne
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 08:10:59PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote: > > Nothing should ever require you to disable automounting. The default should > be not to mount new devices, anything else sounds like a bug to me. -1

Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-05 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Apr 5, 2012 4:17 PM, "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" wrote: > > > It would appear that on Apr 4, Tom Gundersen did say: > > > On Apr 4, 2012 11:14 AM, "David" wrote: > > > Uh, is there any way to revert to old mapping? > > > I do not like the new one. > > > > You'd have to check with udisks. My guess

Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-05 Thread Joe(theWordy)Philbrook
It would appear that on Apr 4, Tom Gundersen did say: > On Apr 4, 2012 11:14 AM, "David" wrote: > > Uh, is there any way to revert to old mapping? > > I do not like the new one. > > You'd have to check with udisks. My guess is that while reverting might > work for the time being /media is going

Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-04 Thread Leonid Isaev
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 18:44:33 +0100 Kevin Chadwick wrote: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:20:01 +0200 > Tom Gundersen wrote: > > > In that case they'll use whatever udisks2 uses, yes. > > Does udisk2 support custom filesystem options? Though to be honest I'll > probably stick with my udev rules anyway as

Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-04 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:20:01 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote: > In that case they'll use whatever udisks2 uses, yes. Does udisk2 support custom filesystem options? Though to be honest I'll probably stick with my udev rules anyway as I much prefer guaranteed easy to type directory names like /media/usb[0

Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-04 Thread Mantas M.
On 2012-04-04 15:20, Tom Gundersen wrote: > In that case they'll use whatever udisks2 uses, yes. AFAIU the current > dir might be a stop-gap solution, and the devs are considering using > $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR/media/LABEL in the end. That would mean: > /run/USER/media/LABEL. No, AFAIK, $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR

Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-04 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Vladimir Lomov wrote: > It depends. I usually mount USB flash using pcmanfm, thunar or nautilus > then run krusader (doh, until now I didn't know how to mount USB sticks > using krusader) and work with the stick. > > Nevermind, krusader like dolphin uses /media to m

Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-04 Thread Vladimir Lomov
Hello, ** Tom Gundersen [2012-04-04 13:03:19 +0200]: > On Apr 4, 2012 11:14 AM, "David" wrote: >> On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:05:55 +0300, Tom Gundersen wrote: >>> On Apr 4, 2012 4:46 AM, "Vladimir Lomov" wrote: Hello, after system upgrade (seems after 2012-04-02) all USB flashes are >

Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-04 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Apr 4, 2012 11:14 AM, "David" wrote: > > On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:05:55 +0300, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >> On Apr 4, 2012 4:46 AM, "Vladimir Lomov" wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hello, >>> after system upgrade (seems after 2012-04-02) all USB flashes are >>> mounted in /run/media/USER/LABEL instead of /medi

Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-04 Thread Jochen Maes (Gcool)
Looking at your originating mail, you seem to have both udisks and udisks2 installed. Simply removing udisk2 and sticking with udisks should be sufficient here. 2012/4/4, David : > On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:05:55 +0300, Tom Gundersen wrote: > >> On Apr 4, 2012 4:46 AM, "Vladimir Lomov" wrote: >>> >

Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-04 Thread David
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:05:55 +0300, Tom Gundersen wrote: On Apr 4, 2012 4:46 AM, "Vladimir Lomov" wrote: Hello, after system upgrade (seems after 2012-04-02) all USB flashes are mounted in /run/media/USER/LABEL instead of /media/LABEL that was previously. Is it intentional or is it a bug?

Re: [arch-general] USB mounted into "wrong" directory

2012-04-04 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Apr 4, 2012 4:46 AM, "Vladimir Lomov" wrote: > > Hello, > after system upgrade (seems after 2012-04-02) all USB flashes are > mounted in /run/media/USER/LABEL instead of /media/LABEL that was > previously. Is it intentional or is it a bug? This is intentional. It is done by udisks2, while udi