Thunderbird asks me to migrate my keys, and I am not
sure, if I should not wait a few more days.
Whatever you choose, a warning: set a strong master password for
Thunderbird before doing the migration. Otherwise Thunderbird stores
your private key unencrypted and there is no warning about the
Hello Nico,
You cannot use gpg for public key operations but for secret key ops.
Please follow the instructions for smartcards (no smartcard daemon needed
obviously):
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:OpenPGP:Smartcards
Then you can use the external gpg with your ~/.gnupg for decryption and
Thunderbird 78 is in the repos for quite some time now. Can anyone
please explain me what is the best way to use GPG now for email encryption?
I read that Archlinux aims to use the system wide gpg keyring instead of
thunderbirds builtin store. Is that still the case and is that
implemented yet? Th
On 09.11.20 17:27, Jens John wrote:
Just don't bother with Arch's release cycle and use Mozilla's build, either
directly (with auto updates) or through
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunderbird-bin/.
That's what I did not. I uninstalled the thunderbird package completely
and used Mozill
> Can this at least be built and placed to "testing"? This would offer at
> least some way to easily get pending security updates installed without
> manual compiling.
Just don't bother with Arch's release cycle and use Mozilla's build, either
directly (with auto updates) or through
https://au
On 08.11.20 07:18, Archange via arch-general wrote:
anthraxx did update the PKGBUILD and we are testing the build but currently for
instance I’m unable to decrypt messages using the external GnuPG feature
(reported upstream), and there is also a build issue with system bzip2 (I used
the vendor
On 11/8/20 2:12 PM, Archange via arch-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/11/2020 00:05, Peter via arch-general wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>> anthraxx did update the PKGBUILD and we are testing the build but currently
>>> for instance I’m unable to decrypt messages using the external GnuPG
>>> feature (rep
Hi,
On 09/11/2020 00:05, Peter via arch-general wrote:
Hello,
anthraxx did update the PKGBUILD and we are testing the build but
currently for instance I’m unable to decrypt messages using the
external GnuPG feature (reported upstream), and there is also a build
issue with system bzip2 (I use
Hi,
Le 8 novembre 2020 01:59:07 GMT+04:00, Bjoern Franke via arch-general
a écrit :
>Hi,
>
>> I have not thoroughly tested through things on the build yet, though.
>> I have never used thunderbird much, so I'm not sure I would be the best
>> person to test and ensure all of it's features work ri
Hi,
> I have not thoroughly tested through things on the build yet, though.
> I have never used thunderbird much, so I'm not sure I would be the best
> person to test and ensure all of it's features work right. I do want
> to however verify that removing the newly unsupported flags isn't
> breakin
t 29 13:57:35 CET 2020
> > To:
> > Cc: Morten Linderud
> > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 01:51:23PM +0100, Geo Kozey via arch-general wrote:
> > > > From: Kevin Morris
> > > > With the upda
> From: Morten Linderud via arch-general
> Sent: Thu Oct 29 13:57:35 CET 2020
> To:
> Cc: Morten Linderud
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 01:51:23PM +0100, Geo Kozey via arch-general wrote:
> > > From: Kevin Mor
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 01:51:23PM +0100, Geo Kozey via arch-general wrote:
> > From: Kevin Morris
> > With the update, TB is implementing PGP by themselves without gnupg
> > for internal PGP usage. This is quite a large change, security-wise,
> > and could result in encryption/signing being broke
> From: Kevin Morris
> Sent: Thu Oct 29 00:28:04 CET 2020
> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78
>
>
> Could you guys reference the security patches that Arch is
> critically missing out on by delaying this update? I'
Hi,
> Yes, it's taking longer than usual. But the good news is, after this
> update, I doubt Mozilla will be modifying their PGP implementation
> anytime soon, and thus won't need such close review.
To be honest, it's somehow irritating to stick on a version because
somebody may find an impleme
Could you guys reference the security patches that Arch is
critically missing out on by delaying this update? I've noticed
a couple of you speaking on that, but not actually citing
any concrete problem areas.
With the update, TB is implementing PGP by themselves without gnupg
for internal PGP usag
> From: Maarten de Vries via arch-general
> Sent: Wed Oct 28 12:20:45 CET 2020
> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Cc: Maarten de Vries
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 23:26, Bjoern Franke via arch-general <
> arc
Le 28/10/2020 à 15:20, Maarten de Vries via arch-general a écrit :
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 23:26, Bjoern Franke via arch-general <
> arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
>
>> Am 27.10.20 um 23:12 schrieb Javier via arch-general:
>>> I really hope not, I prefer to wait than having to build TB on ever
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 23:26, Bjoern Franke via arch-general <
arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
> Am 27.10.20 um 23:12 schrieb Javier via arch-general:
> > I really hope not, I prefer to wait than having to build TB on every
> release. Besides, current version works just fine...
> >
>
> There a
Am 27.10.20 um 23:12 schrieb Javier via arch-general:
> I really hope not, I prefer to wait than having to build TB on every release.
> Besides, current version works just fine...
>
There are also bin-packages so you don't have build it really.
Best Regards
Bjoern
gt;> To:
>> Cc: Bjoern Franke
>> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78
>>
>> I've switched now to 78.4.0 (from AUR) and it seems at lot of bugs of
>> the first 78.x releases are gone.
>>
>> And even Ubuntu ships 78.x now, so switching
> From: Bjoern Franke via arch-general
> Sent: Tue Oct 27 14:35:38 CET 2020
> To:
> Cc: Bjoern Franke
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78
>
> I've switched now to 78.4.0 (from AUR) and it seems at lot of bugs of
> the first 78.x releases are gone.
>
Hi,
>>
>> Upstream requested all distros to not ship Thunderbird 78 until 78.2 is
>> released:
>> https://twitter.com/mozthunderbird/status/1284418789153497090
>>
>> Yours sincerely
>>
>> G. K.
>>
>
> Since upstream is now on version 78.3.3 and the message about upgrading
> (on release notes) h
On 8/15/20 2:38 PM, Geo Kozey wrote:
From: Franck STAUFFER
Sent: Sat Aug 15 09:32:51 CEST 2020
To: karx via arch-general
Subject: Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78
Shouldn't it be the opposite?
This is not Debian Stable, packages should be up-to
> Is it possible to update it in [testing] at least?
This version is not an “upgradeable” release, as stated by the
upstream. Not considered “next version” in the upgrades sequence. The
next version after 68.11 is 78.2, which is not released yet.
Hypothetically [testing] could provide that rel
>
> From: Franck STAUFFER
> Sent: Sat Aug 15 09:32:51 CEST 2020
> To: karx via arch-general
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] Thunderbird 78
>
>
> Shouldn't it be the opposite?
> This is not Debian Stable, packages should be
Is it possible to update it in [testing] at least?
Le 15/08/2020 à 09:52, Archange via arch-general a écrit :
Le 15 août 2020 11:32:51 GMT+04:00, Franck STAUFFER
a écrit :
Shouldn't it be the opposite?
This is not Debian Stable, packages should be up-to-date and if people
want older package
Le 15 août 2020 11:32:51 GMT+04:00, Franck STAUFFER
a écrit :
>Shouldn't it be the opposite?
>This is not Debian Stable, packages should be up-to-date and if people
>want older package they have to package it themselves in AUR.
>Am I wrong?
Not when a feature expected by many Arch users is b
Shouldn't it be the opposite?
This is not Debian Stable, packages should be up-to-date and if people
want older package they have to package it themselves in AUR.
Am I wrong?
On 8/15/20 5:27 AM, karx via arch-general wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020, 9:45 PM mpan wrote:
Is there any reason the p
Am 15.08.20 um 05:39 schrieb Kusoneko:
> On August 15, 2020 3:27:50 AM UTC, karx via arch-general
> wrote:
>> couldn't we package thunderbird 78 in
>> the AUR for people who absolutely need 78,
>
> Sure, go ahead and do that if you want.
>
There is thunderbird-bin in the AUR which repackages t
On August 15, 2020 3:27:50 AM UTC, karx via arch-general
wrote:
>couldn't we package thunderbird 78 in
>the AUR for people who absolutely need 78,
Sure, go ahead and do that if you want.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020, 9:45 PM mpan wrote:
> > Is there any reason the package is stuck to version 68?
> The reason is given on the very top of the page you have linked.
>
Correct me if I'm wrong, but couldn't we package thunderbird 78 in
something like testing or the AUR for people who absolut
> Is there any reason the package is stuck to version 68?
The reason is given on the very top of the page you have linked.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2020-08-14 21:12 -0400, M Piles wrote:
|
| | | OpenPGP functionality for
| | | Thunderbird 78 is still work in
| | | progress, and is disabled by
| | | default in the initial 78.0
| | | release.
| |
| | 78+ versions do not support Enigmail
| | anymore it seems...
|
| Looking at the relea
>> At this time, users of the Enigmail Add-on should not update to Thunderbird
>> 78.
>> OpenPGP functionality for Thunderbird 78 is still work in progress, and is
>> disabled by default in the initial 78.0 release. See the wiki for how to
>> enable and help with testing.
> I heavily rely on gp
On 8/14/20 4:41 PM, Xorg via arch-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thunderbird 78 is available since 1 month
> (https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/78.0/releasenotes).
> Is there any reason the package is stuck to version 68? Can someone update
> this package?
>
> Thank in advance.
BTW, by l
36 matches
Mail list logo
