On 2013-04-18 14:26, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> Emotional comments, like your and Hugo come time to time, usually on
> aur-general, when packages are moved from AUR to community. AUR
> PKGBUILD are _not_ the property of the maintainer (even if he's a good
> guy who drink beer) and sending a mail
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
wrote:
> On 2013-04-17 22:04, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
>> wrote:
> Yes, but they differ from the defaults for no aparent reason.
> For example, since the sysconfdir was different, upo
On 2013-04-18 14:26, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Chris Down wrote:
> > On 2013-04-17 22:04, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
> > I must say I do find it a bit off that a package with a conflicting name
> > wo
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Chris Down wrote:
> On 2013-04-17 22:04, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
> I must say I do find it a bit off that a package with a conflicting name would
> be added without even attempting to contact the AUR main
On 2013-04-17 22:04, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
> wrote:
> > One of the problems with the new package in [community], is that it's
> > build configuration differs SO MUCH from the defaults (and my own
> > package), that their settings are in
On 2013-04-17 22:04, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
> > Finally, I'm a bit surprised as to how this happened. I planned to
> > propose to move my own package from AUR to [community] at some point,
> > but not yet, since it only has 7 votes (way l
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
wrote:
> One of the problems with the new package in [community], is that it's
> build configuration differs SO MUCH from the defaults (and my own
> package), that their settings are incompatible. I belive this goes
> against the Arch way, whic
Another place to look for packages from [core], [extra], [community],
[multilib] and their respective [*testing]-equivalents is
https://archlinux.org/packages.
Sometimes the search mask is counterintuitive, but it gets the job done.
Greetings,
Christoph
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digit
Am 17.04.2013 13:28, schrieb Hugo Osvaldo Barrera:
> Hi,
>
> All of a sudden, this morning, after running pacman -Syu, I found myself
> incapable of sending emails from several of my machines.
> I had noticed not warnings, or errors, and, after tracking the issue
> for a while, it turns out the pr
On 2013-04-17 08:28, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> At first, I though I'd contact the author, but I couldn't find out
> how. The PKGBUILD does not include the maintainer's email, and he's not
> listed as a TU or Dev.
The maintainer is Sébastien Luttringer, as is shown by pacman -Si.
$ pacman
10 matches
Mail list logo
