Re: [arch-general] Splitting up the 'boinc' package

2009-10-26 Thread Karol Babioch
Hi, I noticed a little thing that still doesn't work. My package doesn't create / contain the libcudart.so, so you can't use your GPU with boinc. In order to make this workable you have to extract the libcudart.so from the linux installer and place it in /var/lib/boinc. I don't know whether this

Re: [arch-general] Splitting up the 'boinc' package

2009-10-26 Thread Karol Babioch
Hi again, it seems that I can't attach my file here, so I've uploaded it: http://web108.server123.star-server.info/boinc.tar.gz -- Best regards, Karol Babioch signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [arch-general] Splitting up the 'boinc' package

2009-10-26 Thread Karol Babioch
Hi, I finally managed it to get a working version of the latest release (6.6.41), which should compile just fine (at least it does for me). I'll attach the package. Could you please take a look at the package and look for mistakes or things that could be done better. Maybe the maintainer (Jarosla

Re: [arch-general] Splitting up the 'boinc' package

2009-10-24 Thread Karol Babioch
Hi, thank you very much for your reply. On Fr, 2009-10-23 at 19:16 +0200, Jaroslav Lichtblau wrote: > To be honest, I don't like the Debian structure of the boinc packages. > Arch also does not have any openssh-server/openssh-client packages. > In my opinion AUR and ABS are the best places for p

Re: [arch-general] Splitting up the 'boinc' package

2009-10-23 Thread Jaroslav Lichtblau
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:47:14PM +0200, Karol Babioch wrote: > On Mo, 2009-10-19 at 23:03 +0200, Daniel Riedemann wrote: > > I don't know if 6.6.38 build correctly, if you have a working PKGBUILD I > > think everyone would be happy (since it is stable). But I don't know if that > > is possible no

Re: [arch-general] Splitting up the 'boinc' package

2009-10-19 Thread Karol Babioch
On Mo, 2009-10-19 at 23:03 +0200, Daniel Riedemann wrote: > I don't know if 6.6.38 build correctly, if you have a working PKGBUILD I > think everyone would be happy (since it is stable). But I don't know if that > is possible now since a higher version is already in the repos. That would > mean eve

Re: [arch-general] Splitting up the 'boinc' package

2009-10-19 Thread Daniel Riedemann
Hi, the problem was that the stable versions until 6.6.36 just didn't build anymore. Therefore I uploaded the SVN package to the AUR btw ;-) I don't know if 6.6.38 build correctly, if you have a working PKGBUILD I think everyone would be happy (since it is stable). But I don't know if that is pos

Re: [arch-general] Splitting up the 'boinc' package

2009-10-18 Thread Alexandr Bashmakov
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trusted_Users

Re: [arch-general] Splitting up the 'boinc' package

2009-10-18 Thread Karol Babioch
On Mo, 2009-10-19 at 01:18 +0400, Alexandr Bashmakov wrote: > You can find address in PKGBUILD file: > http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/community/boinc/repos/community-x86_64/PKGBUILD > I guess I was a little bit too fast with my conclusion, because I can't send him emails at all, as they are retur

Re: [arch-general] Splitting up the 'boinc' package

2009-10-18 Thread Karol Babioch
On Mo, 2009-10-19 at 01:18 +0400, Alexandr Bashmakov wrote: > You can find address in PKGBUILD file: > http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/community/boinc/repos/community-x86_64/PKGBUILD > Thanks a lot, haven't looked there at all :(. -- Karol Babioch signature.asc Description: This is a digita

Re: [arch-general] Splitting up the 'boinc' package

2009-10-18 Thread Alexandr Bashmakov
You can find address in PKGBUILD file: http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/community/boinc/repos/community-x86_64/PKGBUILD

Re: [arch-general] Splitting up the 'boinc' package

2009-10-18 Thread Karol Babioch
On So, 2009-10-18 at 16:14 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 13:49, Karol Babioch wrote: > > Hi, > > It probably makes more sense to mail the maintainer of the package > directly as not everyone reads the ML > Thanks for your response. This may sound stupid, but how can I co

Re: [arch-general] Splitting up the 'boinc' package

2009-10-18 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 13:49, Karol Babioch wrote: > Hi, It probably makes more sense to mail the maintainer of the package directly as not everyone reads the ML