Re: [arch-general] Please update boost from [extra] - PKGBUILD attached

2009-11-27 Thread K. Piche
I was waiting for 1.41 to come out since I knew it would be soon. I didn't want to rebuild everything for 1.40 only to have the new version released the next day. k On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 15:12 +0100, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > On 25.11.2009 00:45, Ionut Biru wrote: > > On 11/25/2009 01:39 AM,

Re: [arch-general] Please update boost from [extra] - PKGBUILD attached

2009-11-26 Thread Giovanni Scafora
2009/11/25, Aaron Griffin : > If the soname changes, then everything needs to be rebuilt. We try to > keep one large rebuild in testing at a time. Currently we have > rebuilds for heimdal in there. I just checked it out. The soname changes, then everything needs to be rebuilt. We can do that, bu

Re: [arch-general] Please update boost from [extra] - PKGBUILD attached

2009-11-25 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: > On 25.11.2009 00:45, Ionut Biru wrote: >> On 11/25/2009 01:39 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: >>> Boost in [extra] has been out-of-date since 1830 (and marked as such) >>> and even though I mailed the maintainer two weeks ago no update >>>

Re: [arch-general] Please update boost from [extra] - PKGBUILD attached

2009-11-25 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 25.11.2009 00:45, Ionut Biru wrote: > On 11/25/2009 01:39 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: >> Boost in [extra] has been out-of-date since 1830 (and marked as such) >> and even though I mailed the maintainer two weeks ago no update >> happened. >> Here is my updated PKGBUILD for 1.41.0 which is actu

Re: [arch-general] Please update boost from [extra] - PKGBUILD attached

2009-11-24 Thread Ionut Biru
On 11/25/2009 01:39 AM, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: Boost in [extra] has been out-of-date since 1830 (and marked as such) and even though I mailed the maintainer two weeks ago no update happened. Here is my updated PKGBUILD for 1.41.0 which is actually a bit neater than before since no silly patche