On 2/19/19 11:26 AM, Tinu Weber wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:22:34 -0500, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
>> On 2/19/19 10:19 AM, Tinu Weber wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 14:10:34 +0100, Robin Broda via arch-general wrote:
remakepkg invalidates .BUILDINFO and breaks reproducib
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:22:34 -0500, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> On 2/19/19 10:19 AM, Tinu Weber wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 14:10:34 +0100, Robin Broda via arch-general wrote:
> >> remakepkg invalidates .BUILDINFO and breaks reproducible builds as far as
> >> i can tell.
> >
On 2/19/19 10:19 AM, Tinu Weber wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 14:10:34 +0100, Robin Broda via arch-general wrote:
>> remakepkg invalidates .BUILDINFO and breaks reproducible builds as far as i
>> can tell.
>
> The semantics of .BUILDINFO in the context of remakepkg were unclear to
> me, so I c
On 2/19/19 4:19 PM, Tinu Weber wrote:
> Author of remakepkg here. I think that adding such functionality to
> pacman would be a bit... backwards.
>
>
>> remakepkg invalidates .BUILDINFO and breaks reproducible builds as far as i
>> can tell.
>
> The semantics of .BUILDINFO in the context of re
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 14:10:34 +0100, Robin Broda via arch-general wrote:
> On 2/19/19 7:20 AM, Michael Lojkovic via arch-general wrote:
> >
> > The only thing I can think of, which applies to Arch is implementing
> > remakepkg features in pacman. I was going to add those in when I got
> > aroun
On 2/19/19 1:20 AM, Michael Lojkovic via arch-general wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 20:51:37 +0530
> Aniket Pradhan wrote:
>
>> Hello Govind, and Everyone!
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback.
>>
>> Your arguments are on point, and I agree with you on the fact that the
>> ideas do not apply to Arch.
>>
On 2/19/19 7:20 AM, Michael Lojkovic via arch-general wrote:
>
> The only thing I can think of, which applies to Arch is implementing
> remakepkg features in pacman. I was going to add those in when I got
> around to it, but it's also worth doing for Google Summer of Code.
>
> https://bbs.archli
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 20:51:37 +0530
Aniket Pradhan wrote:
> Hello Govind, and Everyone!
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> Your arguments are on point, and I agree with you on the fact that the
> ideas do not apply to Arch.
>
> If we can think of some better ideas (which apply to Arch, like the
>
Hello Aniket (and all),
Long-time lurker here.
I too am a student, and would love to be working on this. However,
FoxBoron's comments on the thread seem to me to be pretty on-point and
pragmatic with regards to the logistics aspect of it.
Another issue I have is the limited number of areas withi
9 matches
Mail list logo
