Jason,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Jason Chu wrote:
Ok, this is probably going to take a little bit of fiddling. Let's get off
the mailing list. Can you open a ticket in the bug tracker where we can
talk about this more?
Will do. Give me just a bit to register a bugtracker account.
Kevin
http:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:03:17PM -0600, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
> Jason,
>
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Jason Chu wrote:
>
>
>> What does readelf -d /usr/bin/c3270 tell you? Namcap doesn't actually use
>> ldd, it uses something faster and more accurate.
>
> I'm guessing it's the "Shared Library" section
Jason,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Jason Chu wrote:
What does readelf -d /usr/bin/c3270 tell you? Namcap doesn't actually use
ldd, it uses something faster and more accurate.
I'm guessing it's the "Shared Library" section that important to namcap.
readelf shows:
0x0001 (NEEDED)
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:47:11AM -0600, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
> Jason,
>
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Jason Chu wrote:
>
>> Ok, after building the PKGBUILD and running namcap on it, I got these
>> messages:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a]$ namcap c3270-3.3.7p1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
>> c3270 W: Dependency i
Jason,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Jason Chu wrote:
Ok, after building the PKGBUILD and running namcap on it, I got these
messages:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a]$ namcap c3270-3.3.7p1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
c3270 W: Dependency included but already satisfied (ncurses)
c3270 W: Dependency included but alre
On Jan 29, 2008 11:22 AM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:55:26AM -0600, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
> > Jason,
> >
> > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Jason Chu wrote:
> >
> >> Being the guy who wrote namcap, I'm pretty sure it doesn't do this at all.
> >>
> >> Can I get a copy of
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:55:26AM -0600, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
> Jason,
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Jason Chu wrote:
>
>> Being the guy who wrote namcap, I'm pretty sure it doesn't do this at all.
>>
>> Can I get a copy of the PKGBUILD to test with? It sounds like it should be
>> detecting these...
Jason,
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Jason Chu wrote:
Being the guy who wrote namcap, I'm pretty sure it doesn't do this at all.
Can I get a copy of the PKGBUILD to test with? It sounds like it should be
detecting these...
I sent you a private e-mail with the PKGBUILD attached.
Kevin
http://www.Ra
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 01:17:33PM -0600, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Travis Willard wrote:
>
>> I think namcap ignores dependencies in the 'base' group, since
>> everyone is expected to have base installed, maybe? I'm not 100% sure
>> of its internals in this sense.
>
> That soun
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Travis Willard wrote:
I think namcap ignores dependencies in the 'base' group, since
everyone is expected to have base installed, maybe? I'm not 100% sure
of its internals in this sense.
That sounds like a reasonable possibility. To get an idea of whether
it's more comm
On Jan 28, 2008 1:26 PM, Kevin Monceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Travis Willard wrote:
>
> > That's odd - it looks like it ought to depend on ncurses (and
> > openssl?) at the very least. You can run pacman -Qo on those files to
> > see what packages they belong to, and st
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Travis Willard wrote:
That's odd - it looks like it ought to depend on ncurses (and
openssl?) at the very least. You can run pacman -Qo on those files to
see what packages they belong to, and stick 'em in the deps.
Well, it gets even stranger. I tried adding dependencies
On Jan 28, 2008 12:03 PM, Kevin Monceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Travis Willard wrote:
>
> > Build the package, then run namcap
> > /path/to/pkgname-pkgver-pkgrel.pkg.tar.gz and it'll tell you. If you
> > can't even build the package because of missing deps on your system
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Travis Willard wrote:
Build the package, then run namcap
/path/to/pkgname-pkgver-pkgrel.pkg.tar.gz and it'll tell you. If you
can't even build the package because of missing deps on your system,
then check out the project's documentation - they're usually pretty
good about
Hi,
You should also try to run namcap on the resulting package and not only on
the PKGBUILD ;-)
Regards,
Colin Pitrat
Kevin Monceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
Arch General User Mailing List
cc
Subject
[arch-general] New User(sort of) and a packaging question
Kevin Monceaux <[EMAIL PROTE
On Jan 28, 2008 11:46 AM, Kevin Monceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found a few mentions of namcap on the wiki. I tried it on the package I
> created, which I don't currently have any dependencies listed in, and the
> only problems it reports are missing maintainer and CVS id tags. It
> menti
Kevin Monceaux wrote:
By
the way, What does the name namcap stand for?
Kevin
I think it's just "pacman" spelled backwards.
DR
17 matches
Mail list logo
