At Fri, 13 Aug 2010 22:01:08 +1000,
Allan McRae wrote:
> So it is a deliberate choice to put it there. Fedora also does things
> that way. Debian and Gentoo do it the opposite.
>
> So I am not sure what is the best here. Could you just use -h with
> your tar?
It is not problem. But it is st
On 13/08/10 21:30, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
At Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:20:32 +1000,
Allan McRae wrote:
On 04/08/10 15:37, Andreas Radke wrote:
New version is in testing without a homedir for the mailman user. Please
try to upgrade from last version in our extra repo. Tell us if I broke
something.
At Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:20:32 +1000,
Allan McRae wrote:
>
> On 04/08/10 15:37, Andreas Radke wrote:
> > New version is in testing without a homedir for the mailman user. Please
> > try to upgrade from last version in our extra repo. Tell us if I broke
> > something.
>
>
> Has anybody tested the v
On 04/08/10 15:37, Andreas Radke wrote:
New version is in testing without a homedir for the mailman user. Please
try to upgrade from last version in our extra repo. Tell us if I broke
something.
Has anybody tested the version of mailman in [testing]? This will need
to be moved before the py
New version is in testing without a homedir for the mailman user. Please
try to upgrade from last version in our extra repo. Tell us if I broke
something.
-Andy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 24/07/10 02:55, Dan Vratil wrote:
I tried the latest version of mailman (2.1.13) as you suggested. I used the
PKGBUILD from SVN trunk, but I modified it, so that it does not require
/home/mailman and mailman user and group to exist during build and I modified
the mailman.install file so that u
On Thursday 22 July 2010 00:21:24 Dan McGee wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 21, 2010, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:38:37 +0200
> >
> > Dan Vratil wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> please, could someone update the mailman package? It's outdated quite
> >> a long (at least since February 2009)
On 22/07/10 08:21, Dan McGee wrote:
On Wednesday, July 21, 2010, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:38:37 +0200
Dan Vratil wrote:
Hi,
please, could someone update the mailman package? It's outdated quite
a long (at least since February 2009) and there is a new version
2.1.13 from
On Wednesday, July 21, 2010, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:38:37 +0200
> Dan Vratil wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> please, could someone update the mailman package? It's outdated quite
>> a long (at least since February 2009) and there is a new version
>> 2.1.13 from December 2009.
>>
>> Th
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:38:37 +0200
Dan Vratil wrote:
> Hi,
> please, could someone update the mailman package? It's outdated quite
> a long (at least since February 2009) and there is a new version
> 2.1.13 from December 2009.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Dan
>
>
Flag it as out of date.
Ananda
10 matches
Mail list logo
