> On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 13:59 -0800, eliott wrote:
>> This thread is stupid.
>> If you want ext2 compiled into the kernel by default.. for goodness
>> sake, do it yourself. It would be what.. a two line change in the ABS
>> pkgbuild for the kernel?
>>
>> The original poster said he had a thin clie
>> don't be so aggressive... I just asked friendly to add ext2 to the
>> standard kernel, because that is the only change I need to do, to run
>> my systems.
>
>
> My apologies.
> I reread my post and it does appear a bit cranky.
> Not sure about 'agressive', but it was definitely 'grumpy'.
Um,.
> don't be so aggressive... I just asked friendly to add ext2 to the
> standard kernel, because that is the only change I need to do, to run my
> systems.
My apologies.
I reread my post and it does appear a bit cranky.
Not sure about 'agressive', but it was definitely 'grumpy'.
On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 13:59 -0800, eliott wrote:
> This thread is stupid.
> If you want ext2 compiled into the kernel by default.. for goodness
> sake, do it yourself. It would be what.. a two line change in the ABS
> pkgbuild for the kernel?
>
> The original poster said he had a thin client farm
This thread is stupid.
If you want ext2 compiled into the kernel by default.. for goodness
sake, do it yourself. It would be what.. a two line change in the ABS
pkgbuild for the kernel?
The original poster said he had a thin client farm using the old
initrd image, so he has likely diverged from th
On Sunday 02 March 2008, Jan de Groot wrote:
> External harddisks and USB sticks come preformatted with FAT32 because
> NTFS isn't compatible with Mac OS X. FAT32 is the only choice for these
> vendors if they want cross-compatibility.
> When you install Windows on a >32GB partition, the setup does
On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 14:11 +0100, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote:
> On Sunday 02 March 2008, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > then FAT32 wouldn't be a dead filesystem either.
>
> Well, in my experience almost every USB stick or newly buyed hard disk comes
> formated on FAT32. I don't wanna get into why is tha
On Sunday 02 March 2008, Jan de Groot wrote:
> then FAT32 wouldn't be a dead filesystem either.
Well, in my experience almost every USB stick or newly buyed hard disk comes
formated on FAT32. I don't wanna get into why is that, but it's just the way
it is.
By the way, I know many people that ha
On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 20:50 -0600, Dan McGee wrote:
>
> Your entire rest of statement was valid, but why on earth did you make
> a claim like this? I have to speak up and say something here. ext2 is
> nowhere near dead. I use it on my /boot partition on every Linux
> install, and every filesystem
On Sunday 02 March 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
> > Ext2 is a dead filesystem and has been replaced by ext3.
>
> Your entire rest of statement was valid, but why on earth did you make
> a claim like this? I have to speak up and say something here. ext2 is
> nowhere near dead. I use it on my /boot partit
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 22:42 +0100, Peter Feuerer wrote:
> > Anyway, my question was not about finding a way to replace the initrd.
> > I
> > asked if it would be possible to add ext2 into the standard kernel's
> > config
On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 02:51 +0100, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 22:42 +0100, Peter Feuerer wrote:
> > Anyway, my question was not about finding a way to replace the initrd.
> > I
> > asked if it would be possible to add ext2 into the standard kernel's
> > config of archlinux again.
On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 22:42 +0100, Peter Feuerer wrote:
> Anyway, my question was not about finding a way to replace the initrd.
> I
> asked if it would be possible to add ext2 into the standard kernel's
> config of archlinux again. Through many ppl use ext2 anyway, e.g. for
> their /boot partition
On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 17:13 -0500, Loui wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Peter Feuerer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > just wanted to ask, why ext2 isn't built directly into the kernel
> > anymore?
> Was this just from the last kernel update? My /boot partition is ext2
> so will I be a
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Peter Feuerer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just wanted to ask, why ext2 isn't built directly into the kernel
> anymore?
Was this just from the last kernel update? My /boot partition is ext2
so will I be able to boot now? (I haven't tried rebooting yet)
On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 20:27 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Peter Feuerer schrieb:
> > I don't use the arch initcpio generated initramfs. I create a standalone
> > "old" initrd containing the complete root filesystem of the arch
> > installation myself. And due to the fact that the initrd is using e
Peter Feuerer schrieb:
I don't use the arch initcpio generated initramfs. I create a standalone
"old" initrd containing the complete root filesystem of the arch
installation myself. And due to the fact that the initrd is using ext2
as filesystem the kernel can't read it unless i compile ext2 in.
On Sat, 2008-03-01 at 20:28 +0200, Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> 2008/3/1, Peter Feuerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > just wanted to ask, why ext2 isn't built directly into the kernel
> > anymore? Is there any special reason?
> > I would prefer to have ext2 built in again, because I'm de
2008/3/1, Peter Feuerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi list,
>
> just wanted to ask, why ext2 isn't built directly into the kernel
> anymore? Is there any special reason?
> I would prefer to have ext2 built in again, because I'm dealing a lot
> with special configurations of archlinux, like thinclie
19 matches
Mail list logo
