+1 to this
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Myra Nelson wrote:
> I would like to thank all those who are working so diligently to make Arch
> Linux more usable. There are just too many to list in one spot.
>
> Dave's install scripts are great. This was the easiest install I've ever
> done save p
[2012-07-22 21:02:00 +] Fons Adriaensen:
> But it *definitely* goes against anything 'upstream' or 'mainstream'.
LOL - You really believe those two things are the same?
No wonder your trolls do not make much sense...
> So if the Arch devs/maintainers are invoking 'upstream' or some
> general
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 07/22/2012 11:35 PM, Nicholas MIller wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:30 PM, v01...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> >
> >> Why don't you want to use `pacman -Ss` for a list of available packages?
> >>
> >> Since I've yet to try the "new" method of
On 07/22/2012 11:35 PM, Nicholas MIller wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:30 PM, v01...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Why don't you want to use `pacman -Ss` for a list of available packages?
>>
>> Since I've yet to try the "new" method of installing, I suppose i could,
> however i was under the impressi
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:30 PM, v01...@gmail.com wrote:
> Why don't you want to use `pacman -Ss` for a list of available packages?
>
> Since I've yet to try the "new" method of installing, I suppose i could,
however i was under the impression pacman -Ss required an arguement for
what you are sea
On 07/22/2012 11:19 PM, Nicholas MIller wrote:
> I just looked over the install script wiki page, and was curious if there
> was any plan on adding something similiar to AIF where you could browse the
> avalible packages, I know for me at least during install I may know what i
> need to install but
Why don't you want to use `pacman -Ss` for a list of available packages?
2012/7/22 Nicholas MIller
> where you could browse the
> avalible packages
>
--
Sincerely,
Andrew Trabo
7 matches
Mail list logo
