[ I had to reconstruct the message from the online archive -- sorry if message
ID is screwed ]
On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 17:54:14 +0100
adys.wh at gmail.com (Jerome Leclanche) wrote:
> Slightly OT but for those interested, I added the heartbleed utility
> (used by the heartbleed checker site) to the A
> I actually did push an updated package within 3 hours after the public
> announcement. I think that is pretty reasonable especially since we are
> not among the fortunate distros and companies that were notified
> beforehand.
It's very good! Only a few distribution and vendors can do that!
What
Hi
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Neal Oakey wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> there is an Bug(1) in OpenSSL 1.0.1 and as far as I'm informed this has
>> only been patched in 1.0.1g.
>> Many other Distributions have build there own patch, what is
Slightly OT but for those interested, I added the heartbleed utility
(used by the heartbleed checker site) to the AUR:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/heartbleed-git/
% heartbleed mediacru.sh:443
2014/04/08 17:53:57 mediacru.sh:443 - SAFE
J. Leclanche
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Anatol Po
Hi
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am 08.04.2014 17:29, schrieb Neal Oakey:
>> Hi,
>>
>> there is an Bug(1) in OpenSSL 1.0.1 and as far as I'm informed this has
>> only been patched in 1.0.1g.
>> Many other Distributions have build there own patch, what is with us?
>> Curr
Am 08.04.2014 17:29, schrieb Neal Oakey:
> Hi,
>
> there is an Bug(1) in OpenSSL 1.0.1 and as far as I'm informed this has
> only been patched in 1.0.1g.
> Many other Distributions have build there own patch, what is with us?
> Currently we have "1.0.1.f-2" which is effected as far as I can know.
On 08/04/2014 17:29, Neal Oakey wrote:
> Many other Distributions have build there own patch, what is with us?
As a reminder, there is now a Wiki page that tracks all security issues
and their status in Arch Linux [1]. If it's not there, please either add
the issue in the wiki by yourself and file
Hi,
ah ... ok kickt the top mirror - now I'm back up to date
tanks
Neal
Am 08.04.2014 17:32, schrieb y...@marupa.net:
> On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 05:29:11 PM Neal Oakey wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> there is an Bug(1) in OpenSSL 1.0.1 and as far as I'm informed this has
>> only been patched in 1.0.1g.
>>
> Currently we have "1.0.1.f-2" which is effected as far as I can know.
pacman -Syu should upgrade it to 1.0.1.g-1?
pacman -Q openssl reports that version anyway, which fixes heartbleed.
[1]
Greetings,
Zeger-Jan van de Weg
[1] https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140407.txt
Hi
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Neal Oakey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is an Bug(1) in OpenSSL 1.0.1 and as far as I'm informed this has
> only been patched in 1.0.1g.
> Many other Distributions have build there own patch, what is with us?
It is fixed already. The new version of openssl is in stab
% pacman -Si openssl
Repository : core
Name : openssl
Version: 1.0.1.g-1
Description: The Open Source toolkit for Secure Sockets Layer and
Transport Layer Security
Architecture : x86_64
URL: https://www.openssl.org
Licenses : custom:BSD
Groups :
On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 05:29:11 PM Neal Oakey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is an Bug(1) in OpenSSL 1.0.1 and as far as I'm informed this has
> only been patched in 1.0.1g.
> Many other Distributions have build there own patch, what is with us?
> Currently we have "1.0.1.f-2" which is effected as far
12 matches
Mail list logo
