Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-09-03 Thread siyuan
this worked for me, thank you! fredbezies gmail.com> writes: > > Well, Tom gave the answer. Boot on rescue-CD / rescue USB-key. > > Remove /lib. > > And create a symlink : ln -sf /usr/lib lib

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-08 Thread DR
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Christian Hesse wrote: > DR on Sun, 2012/07/08 23:37: > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Christian Hesse wrote: > > > > > Jonathan Hudson on Sat, 2012/07/07 17:00: > > > > On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:35:56 +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote: > > > > > > > > >On 07/07/2012 0

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-08 Thread Christian Hesse
DR on Sun, 2012/07/08 23:37: > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Christian Hesse wrote: > > > Jonathan Hudson on Sat, 2012/07/07 17:00: > > > On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:35:56 +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote: > > > > > > >On 07/07/2012 05:27 PM, fredbezies wrote: > > > >> Well, Tom gave the answer. Boot on

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-08 Thread DR
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Christian Hesse wrote: > Jonathan Hudson on Sat, 2012/07/07 17:00: > > On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:35:56 +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote: > > > > >On 07/07/2012 05:27 PM, fredbezies wrote: > > >> Well, Tom gave the answer. Boot on rescue-CD / rescue USB-key. > > >> > > >> Re

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-07 Thread Christian Hesse
Jonathan Hudson on Sat, 2012/07/07 17:00: > On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:35:56 +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote: > > >On 07/07/2012 05:27 PM, fredbezies wrote: > >> Well, Tom gave the answer. Boot on rescue-CD / rescue USB-key. > >> > >> Remove /lib. > >> > >> And create a symlink : ln -sf /usr/lib lib > >> >

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-07 Thread Jonathan Hudson
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 21:51:43 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: >On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 08:32:36PM +0100, Jonathan Hudson wrote: >> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 21:15:50 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: >> >> >On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 06:53:21PM +0100, Jonathan Hudson wrote: >> >> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 19:32:57 +0200,

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-07 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 08:32:36PM +0100, Jonathan Hudson wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 21:15:50 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > >On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 06:53:21PM +0100, Jonathan Hudson wrote: > >> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 19:32:57 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > >> > >> >On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 17:2

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-07 Thread Jonathan Hudson
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 21:15:50 +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: >On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 06:53:21PM +0100, Jonathan Hudson wrote: >> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 19:32:57 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote: >> >> >On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 17:21:24 +0100, Jonathan Hudson wrote: >> >> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 18:18:28 +0200, J

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-07 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 06:53:21PM +0100, Jonathan Hudson wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 19:32:57 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > > >On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 17:21:24 +0100, Jonathan Hudson wrote: > >> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 18:18:28 +0200, Jan Steffens wrote: > >> >You used --force (-f) again. http://i.i

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-07 Thread Jonathan Hudson
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 19:32:57 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote: >On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 17:21:24 +0100, Jonathan Hudson wrote: >> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 18:18:28 +0200, Jan Steffens wrote: >> >You used --force (-f) again. http://i.imgur.com/5Zd1w.png >> >> >> I did NOT. > > >Was /lib your current working

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-07 Thread Geert Hendrickx
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 17:21:24 +0100, Jonathan Hudson wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 18:18:28 +0200, Jan Steffens wrote: > >You used --force (-f) again. http://i.imgur.com/5Zd1w.png > > > I did NOT. Was /lib your current working dir when you ran pacman? Or did any other process have it open so i

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-07 Thread Jérôme M. Berger
fredbezies wrote: > Well, Tom gave the answer. Boot on rescue-CD / rescue USB-key. > > Remove /lib. > Careful about that! The current stable kernel (3.4.4-2) still has its modules in /lib/modules/ so if you remove /lib you may not be able to boot! > And create a symlink : ln -sf /usr/lib

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-07 Thread Arthur Titeica
On Saturday 07 July 2012 18:18:28 Jan Steffens wrote: > On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Jonathan Hudson wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 17:00:06 +0100, Jonathan Hudson wrote: > >>On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:35:56 +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote: > >>>On 07/07/2012 05:27 PM, fredbezies wrote: > Well, Tom g

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-07 Thread Jonathan Hudson
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 18:18:28 +0200, Jan Steffens wrote: >On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Jonathan Hudson wrote: >> On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 17:00:06 +0100, Jonathan Hudson wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:35:56 +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote: >>> On 07/07/2012 05:27 PM, fredbezies wrote: > Well, T

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-07 Thread Jan Steffens
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Jonathan Hudson wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 17:00:06 +0100, Jonathan Hudson wrote: > >>On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:35:56 +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote: >> >>>On 07/07/2012 05:27 PM, fredbezies wrote: Well, Tom gave the answer. Boot on rescue-CD / rescue USB-key. >>

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-07 Thread Jonathan Hudson
On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 17:00:06 +0100, Jonathan Hudson wrote: >On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:35:56 +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote: > >>On 07/07/2012 05:27 PM, fredbezies wrote: >>> Well, Tom gave the answer. Boot on rescue-CD / rescue USB-key. >>> >>> Remove /lib. >>> >>> And create a symlink : ln -sf /usr/lib li

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-07 Thread Jonathan Hudson
On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:35:56 +0200, Arno Gaboury wrote: >On 07/07/2012 05:27 PM, fredbezies wrote: >> Well, Tom gave the answer. Boot on rescue-CD / rescue USB-key. >> >> Remove /lib. >> >> And create a symlink : ln -sf /usr/lib lib >> >> I think there will be a lot of problem for a lot of users w

Re: [arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 and /lib problem : the answer ;)

2012-07-07 Thread Arno Gaboury
On 07/07/2012 05:27 PM, fredbezies wrote: Well, Tom gave the answer. Boot on rescue-CD / rescue USB-key. Remove /lib. And create a symlink : ln -sf /usr/lib lib I think there will be a lot of problem for a lot of users when glibc 2.16.0-x will be uploaded on core. Well, I think I have to do t