On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:15:50AM +0100, Ralf Madorf wrote:
> I don't understand why that much people are using MUAs without a GUI,
> anyway, a penfriend is blind, reading braille, a good reason to use a
> GUI free MUA. An Email I received yesterday was written with User-Agent:
> Alpine 2.00 (DEB
It would appear that on Jan 15, Ralf Madorf did say:
> I don't understand why that much people are using MUAs without a GUI,
> anyway, a penfriend is blind, reading braille, a good reason to use a
> GUI free MUA.
And a good reason to support email standards that are still friendly to
plain-text
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 01:19 -0500, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
> And I note that as a multi-boot/multi-Linux-distribution user That the
> "alpine" packages found in at least some of the distro's repositories
> appears to be compiled from re-alpine sources since If I understand it
> right, the las
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 01:19:29AM -0500, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
> -- snip --
>
> And I note that as a multi-boot/multi-Linux-distribution user That the
> "alpine" packages found in at least some of the distro's repositories
> appears to be compiled from re-alpine sources since If I understa
It would appear that on Jan 13, gt did say:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 05:14:13PM +0200, Mantas M. wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 08:33:36AM -0500, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
> > > Pardon me for jumping in here, but if mutt isn't smart enough to
> > > automatically use In-Reply-To: and/or R
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 07:14:38PM +0200, Mantas M. wrote:
> On 2012-01-13 17:56, gt wrote:
> > Firstly, Alpine isn't maintained anymore.
>
> There is a fork "re-alpine", though.
Yeah, I know of that, but i heard of it, after i got hooked to mutt :)
--
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail
On 2012-01-13 17:56, gt wrote:
> Firstly, Alpine isn't maintained anymore.
There is a fork "re-alpine", though.
--
Mantas M.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 05:14:13PM +0200, Mantas M. wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 08:33:36AM -0500, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
> > Pardon me for jumping in here, but if mutt isn't smart enough to
> > automatically use In-Reply-To: and/or References: headers on replies? Or
> > likes to add ext
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 08:33:36AM -0500, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
>
> It would appear that on Jan 13, Madhurya Kakati did say:
>
> > On 01/13/12 at 08:55am, Alfredo Palhares wrote:
> > > Excerpts from Madhurya Kakati's message of Fri Jan 13 07:23:43 +0100 2012:
> > > > Mailed just to say th
It would appear that on Jan 13, Madhurya Kakati did say:
> On 01/13/12 at 08:55am, Alfredo Palhares wrote:
> > Excerpts from Madhurya Kakati's message of Fri Jan 13 07:23:43 +0100 2012:
> > > Mailed just to say that all of my problems have been resolved. It was a
> > > weird
> > > bug with mutt.
On 01/13/12 at 08:55am, Alfredo Palhares wrote:
> Excerpts from Madhurya Kakati's message of Fri Jan 13 07:23:43 +0100 2012:
> > Mailed just to say that all of my problems have been resolved. It was a
> > weird
> > bug with mutt.
>
> Yeah like, adding "Re:" on every fucking message and not using
Excerpts from Madhurya Kakati's message of Fri Jan 13 07:23:43 +0100 2012:
> Mailed just to say that all of my problems have been resolved. It was a weird
> bug with mutt.
Yeah like, adding "Re:" on every fucking message and not using In-reply-to or
References tag, and break my fucking threads. N
Mailed just to say that all of my problems have been resolved. It was a weird
bug with mutt.
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
