On 20 October 2013 04:13, Alexander Rødseth wrote:
> Would it be expected that packages like nvidia-rt are moved too, if
> linux-rt is moved from AUR to [community]?
Yes. We have generally kept our official repos slim of kernels, and
especially for -rt it was at some point kind of a consensus tha
Would it be expected that packages like nvidia-rt are moved too, if
linux-rt is moved from AUR to [community]?
---
Alexander Rødseth
xyproto / TU
On 19 October 2013 04:21, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> PS after closing the thread. Perhaps we could continue this thread at
> the archaudio list. I'll subscribe within the next days.
You can also drop by #archaudio on Freenode if you use IRC. If you
don't feel comfortable enough to start a new distro y
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 21:48 +0200, Joakim Hernberg wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 20:15:48 +0200
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 19:47 +0200, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> > > I'm not sure why a separate distro would be needed, there's e.g.
> > > http://archaudio.org/
> >
> > Thank yo
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 20:15:48 +0200
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 19:47 +0200, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> > I'm not sure why a separate distro would be needed, there's e.g.
> > http://archaudio.org/
>
> Thank you,
>
> I'm uncertain, if an audio distro is useful and I'll take a deeper
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:35:09AM -0600, Jason Harrer wrote:
> Being a musician and recording using Linux audio, I can concur
> that Arch Ian't the best distro to start with. It's great to
> use when you know what you're doing, though.
I'm runnning around a dozen machines. Half of those are pa
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Jason Harrer wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Ralf Mardorf
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Since Ubuntu for my taste made a big step in the wrong direction, I'm
>>> thinking about an Arch audio distro that can be
On Oct 18, 2013, at 12:04 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
>>
>> Since Ubuntu for my taste made a big step in the wrong direction, I'm
>> thinking about an Arch audio distro that can be used by inexperienced
>> users.
>
>> Isn't it to hard for ine
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 14:04 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
> >
> > Since Ubuntu for my taste made a big step in the wrong direction, I'm
> > thinking about an Arch audio distro that can be used by inexperienced
> > users.
>
> > Isn't it to hard fo
> sometimes I'm thinking about an audio distro based on Arch. I'm
> uncertain, if I'm really willing to spend my time to contribute to such
> a distro and I've got no doubts, that I don't have the skills to do it
> alone.
>
Probably, you can make a repo, where you would place some configuration
fi
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
>
> Since Ubuntu for my taste made a big step in the wrong direction, I'm
> thinking about an Arch audio distro that can be used by inexperienced
> users.
> Isn't it to hard for inexperienced users, musicians who aren't
> interested in computer
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 01:19 +0800, Chris Down wrote:
> "Audio distro" is not very descriptive and doesn't describe your
> intent clearly. Are we talking about audio editing, audio playing, or
> what?
Audio production, as provided by e.g. Ubuntu Studio.
On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 21:05 +0200, Karol Bla
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 19:47 +0200, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>> I'm not sure why a separate distro would be needed, there's e.g.
>> http://archaudio.org/
>
> Thank you,
>
> I'm uncertain, if an audio distro is useful
You can have a look at brand
On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 19:47 +0200, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> I'm not sure why a separate distro would be needed, there's e.g.
> http://archaudio.org/
Thank you,
I'm uncertain, if an audio distro is useful and I'll take a deeper look
into what already exists for Arch later.
Unfortunately the lists
On 2013-10-17 15:46, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> sometimes I'm thinking about an audio distro based on Arch. I'm
> uncertain, if I'm really willing to spend my time to contribute to such
> a distro and I've got no doubts, that I don't have the skills to do it
> alone.
"Audio distro" is not very descript
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Sander Jansen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Karol Blazewicz > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Ralf Mardorf
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > sometimes I'm thinking about an audio distro based on Arch. I'm
>> > uncertain, if I'm really willing
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > sometimes I'm thinking about an audio distro based on Arch. I'm
> > uncertain, if I'm really willing to spend my time to contribute to such
> > a distro and I've got
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sometimes I'm thinking about an audio distro based on Arch. I'm
> uncertain, if I'm really willing to spend my time to contribute to such
> a distro and I've got no doubts, that I don't have the skills to do it
> alone.
>
> I wonder, i
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 07:34 +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:15 +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> >> On 12 February 2013 20:05, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi :)
> >> >
> >> > is there an audio distro based on Arch
Here's a good tool for checking if your system is set up for audio:
https://github.com/raboof/realtimeconfigquickscan
Arch can be a very good distro for audio work - just test any updates.
Regards,
Anntoin
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:15 +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
>> On 12 February 2013 20:05, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>
>> > Hi :)
>> >
>> > is there an audio distro based on Arch Linux, that already is rawly set
>> > up for audio studio production
On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:15 +0800, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
> On 12 February 2013 20:05, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > Hi :)
> >
> > is there an audio distro based on Arch Linux, that already is rawly set
> > up for audio studio production.
> >
> > Another requirement for me is, that such a distro sh
On 12 February 2013 20:05, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
Ralf, if you build up the the system yourself remember to use a RealTime
kernel for professional-grade audio performance.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pro_Audio
On 12 February 2013 20:05, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> is there an audio distro based on Arch Linux, that already is rawly set
> up for audio studio production.
>
> Another requirement for me is, that such a distro shouldn't cause or at
> least only less inconsistencies, when using the Arch a
24 matches
Mail list logo