Re: [arch-general] NetBeans 9.0 not a drop-in replacement of 8.2

2018-11-15 Thread Mr.Elendig
On 13/11/2018 09:18, Leandro Papi wrote: As I understand, it's common, and the good way to have NB9.0 in community repository. I have since then put the package in IgnorePkg and kept using the 8.2 version. There are actually AUR packages for NB8.2 [1], and the nightly version of NB9.0 [2] which

Re: [arch-general] NetBeans 9.0 not a drop-in replacement of 8.2

2018-11-13 Thread Leandro Papi
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 09:05, Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general wrote: > > On 12/11/18, Danila Kiver via arch-general wrote: > > Agree, NB 9.0 is a complete headache and probably should not be considered > > an *upgrade* from 8.2. Even upcoming NB 10.0 does not seem to solve > > all the migrat

Re: [arch-general] NetBeans 9.0 not a drop-in replacement of 8.2

2018-11-13 Thread Leonidas Spyropoulos via arch-general
On 12/11/18, Danila Kiver via arch-general wrote: > Agree, NB 9.0 is a complete headache and probably should not be considered > an *upgrade* from 8.2. Even upcoming NB 10.0 does not seem to solve > all the migration issues. > > Maybe Apache Netbeans (9.0 and higher) has to be distributed as a dif

Re: [arch-general] NetBeans 9.0 not a drop-in replacement of 8.2

2018-11-12 Thread Peter Nabbefeld
Am 12.11.18 um 19:44 schrieb Ali Emre Gülcü via arch-general: I am asking to get the general idea of how the package versioning works, I don't really know what has changed on NetBeans side. [...] Hi Ali, NetBeans 9.0 needs at least JDK 9, and it works only for Java SE. Besides the move to

Re: [arch-general] NetBeans 9.0 not a drop-in replacement of 8.2

2018-11-12 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 11/12/18 1:44 PM, Ali Emre Gülcü via arch-general wrote: > I am asking to get the general idea of how the package versioning works, I > don't really know what has changed on NetBeans side. IIRC there are > different versions of Java and PostgreSQL on official repos (not on AUR) > like jdk8-openj

Re: [arch-general] NetBeans 9.0 not a drop-in replacement of 8.2

2018-11-12 Thread Ali Emre Gülcü via arch-general
I am asking to get the general idea of how the package versioning works, I don't really know what has changed on NetBeans side. IIRC there are different versions of Java and PostgreSQL on official repos (not on AUR) like jdk8-openjdk for specific version and jdk-openjdk for latest and always-update

Re: [arch-general] NetBeans 9.0 not a drop-in replacement of 8.2

2018-11-12 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 11/12/18 12:04 PM, Danila Kiver via arch-general wrote: > Agree, NB 9.0 is a complete headache and probably should not be considered > an *upgrade* from 8.2. Even upcoming NB 10.0 does not seem to solve > all the migration issues. > > Maybe Apache Netbeans (9.0 and higher) has to be distributed

Re: [arch-general] NetBeans 9.0 not a drop-in replacement of 8.2

2018-11-12 Thread Danila Kiver via arch-general
Agree, NB 9.0 is a complete headache and probably should not be considered an *upgrade* from 8.2. Even upcoming NB 10.0 does not seem to solve all the migration issues. Maybe Apache Netbeans (9.0 and higher) has to be distributed as a different package ("apache-netbeans"), conflicting with old "ne