Am 27.10.2011 18:21, schrieb illdred:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:37:12 +0200
> Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
>> Am 27.10.2011 06:00, schrieb illdred:
>>> and some of the error messages mention something about scsi but fore
>>> scrolling past. then the system stops doing anything.
>>
>> Those are probabl
Am 27.10.2011 18:21, schrieb illdred:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:37:12 +0200
> Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
>> Am 27.10.2011 06:00, schrieb illdred:
>>> and some of the error messages mention something about scsi but fore
>>> scrolling past. then the system stops doing anything.
>>
>> Those are probabl
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:37:12 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 27.10.2011 06:00, schrieb illdred:
> > and some of the error messages mention something about scsi but fore
> > scrolling past. then the system stops doing anything.
>
> Those are probably relevant. Details on those?
>
Yes. I've ma
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 27.10.2011 06:00, schrieb illdred:
> > and some of the error messages mention something about scsi but fore
> > scrolling past. then the system stops doing anything.
This may or may not be related, but I had to put
options scsi_mod max_luns=4
(4 wa
Am 27.10.2011 06:00, schrieb illdred:
> and some of the error messages mention something about scsi but fore
> scrolling past. then the system stops doing anything.
Those are probably relevant. Details on those?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:48:34 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 25.10.2011 17:12, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> > Hi guys,
> > please signoff 3.1 series for both arches.
> >
> > Upstream
> > changes:
> > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
> >
> > Archlinux Changes:
> > - $(uname -r) reports now
Am Mittwoch, 26. Oktober 2011, 11:11:19 schrieb Paul Gideon Dann:
>
> The SSC on PCH message may be a debug message that was accidentally left in.
> See: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/19/80
Thanks for the link, looks like it is nothing to worry about.
Dominik
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Wednesday 26 Oct 2011 12:05:08 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> This is the output of dmesg -l err:
>
>
> [1.882959] [drm:ironlake_update_pch_refclk] *ERROR* enabling SSC on PCH
> [ 10.336917] ACPI: Invalid _PSD:coord_type
> [ 10.338144] ACPI: Invalid _PSD:coord_type
> [ 10.338784] ACPI: Inva
Am 26.10.2011 11:54, schrieb Dominik Cermak:
> I get the following message displayed right before the initscripts output:
>
> [2.117965] [drm:ironlake_update_pch_refclk] *ERROR* enabling SSC on PCH
>
> So far I have no problems, but this message seems important.
I have the same, and I am a b
Am Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2011, 20:48:34 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> Am 25.10.2011 17:12, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> > Hi guys,
> > please signoff 3.1 series for both arches.
> >
> > Upstream
> > changes:
> > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
> >
> > Archlinux Changes:
> > - $(uname -r) reports
Il 25/10/2011 20:48, Thomas Bächler ha scritto:
Am 25.10.2011 17:12, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.1 series for both arches.
Upstream
changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
Archlinux Changes:
- $(uname -r) reports now the full kernel version
- all external module
It works well on my laptop.
Signoff i686
--
Bl@ster / dottorblaster
Thomas Bächler on Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:48:34 +0200:
> Am 25.10.2011 17:12, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> > Hi guys,
> > please signoff 3.1 series for both arches.
> >
> > Upstream
> > changes:
> > http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
> >
> > Archlinux Changes:
> > - $(uname -r) reports now the fu
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 25.10.2011 17:12, schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
>> Hi guys,
>> please signoff 3.1 series for both arches.
>>
>> Upstream
>> changes:
>> http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
>>
>> Archlinux Changes:
>> - $(uname -r) reports now the full kern
14 matches
Mail list logo