On 01/21/2010 01:31 PM, Byron Clark wrote:
>
> I'm guessing that none of those were broken because of the kernel
> update, but because of the unfinished libpng rebuild in testing.
>
100% Correct. The issues were libpng12 to libpng14 and libjpg.
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PL
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:19:44PM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 01/20/2010 01:44 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> > packages for e17 wasn't rebuild. have patience or downgrade to
> > extra/community and don't flood the email with useless problems.
> >
> > The rebuilding process is NOT FINISHED.
>
>
On 01/20/2010 01:44 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> packages for e17 wasn't rebuild. have patience or downgrade to
> extra/community and don't flood the email with useless problems.
>
> The rebuilding process is NOT FINISHED.
Sorry, those weren't complaints... Since I have blackbox, e16, e17, fluxbox,
fv
After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs:
(1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker
(2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox
>>>
>>> even with 2.6.32.3, I had to recomile virtualbox module. I tried to start
>>> a VM and system froze solid and had to do h
On Thursday 21 January 2010 00:50:22 David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 January 2010 22:21:19 David C. Rankin wrote:
> >> On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> >> After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two b
On 01/20/2010 09:41 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 01/20/2010 10:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Tobias, all,
After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs:
(1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker
(2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox
It was ironic, because I was using W
On 01/20/2010 10:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Tobias, all,
>
> After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs:
>
> (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker
> (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox
>
> It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the ke
On 01/20/2010 09:21 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
On 20/01/10 16:51, David C. Rankin wrote:
Tobias, all,
After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs:
(1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker
(2) the kernel upgrade kills Virtual
On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Nathan Wayde wrote:
> On 20/01/10 16:51, David C. Rankin wrote:
>>
>> Tobias, all,
>>
>> After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs:
>>
>> (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker
>> (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox
>>
>> It was ironic, becaus
On 01/20/2010 11:28 AM, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 January 2010 22:21:19 David C. Rankin wrote:
>> On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs:
>>
>> (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker
>> (2) the kerne
Processes are still being randomly killed by oom-killer here even tho
there's lots of free swap available, most of the time ksmserver which kills
the kde session. It's been happening since updating to 2.6.32 series. The
issue is discussed here (with patch):
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=1
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 07:42 +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> bump to latest bugfix version.
> Please signoff both arches,
>
> greetings
> tpowa
Everything working perfectly as usual. 32bit kernel with nvidia kernel
module.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
On 20/01/10 16:51, David C. Rankin wrote:
Tobias, all,
After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs:
(1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker
(2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox
It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the kernel and then on
On Wednesday 20 January 2010 22:21:19 David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> After further testing with kernel 2.6.32.4-1, I have found two bugs:
>
> (1) the kernel upgrade kills WindowMaker
> (2) the kernel upgrade kills VirtualBox
even with 2.6.32.3, I had to
On 01/20/2010 11:51 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
It was ironic, because I was using WindowMaker when I installed the
kernel
Just a suggestion: I usually drop down to single user ("sudo telinit
s") before I install major packages like a kernel.
DR
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 10:51 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > On 01/19/2010 12:42 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >> bump to latest bugfix version.
> >> Please signoff both arches,
> >>
> >> greetings
> >> tpowa
> >
> > Can't 'sign off'
On 01/19/2010 04:43 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> On 01/19/2010 12:42 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> bump to latest bugfix version.
>> Please signoff both arches,
>>
>> greetings
>> tpowa
>
> Can't 'sign off', but kernel26 2.6.32.4-1 seems to be working fine on x86_64
> with nvidia. I'
On 01/19/2010 12:42 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> bump to latest bugfix version.
> Please signoff both arches,
>
> greetings
> tpowa
Can't 'sign off', but kernel26 2.6.32.4-1 seems to be working fine on x86_64
with nvidia. I'll load it on my laptop and report back as well after testin
2010/1/20 Tom :
>> That is a (temporary) bug in mkinitcpio, which won't be solved until
>> the next major mkinitcpio version, expected "soon". It doesn't harm
>> anyone, just prints this message.
>
> Sorry to hijack, but I cannot resist...
> I've been having great problems recently with any custom-
> That is a (temporary) bug in mkinitcpio, which won't be solved until
> the next major mkinitcpio version, expected "soon". It doesn't harm
> anyone, just prints this message.
Sorry to hijack, but I cannot resist...
I've been having great problems recently with any custom-built kernel,
both vanil
On 01/19/2010 08:42 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi guys,
bump to latest bugfix version.
Please signoff both arches,
greetings
tpowa
signoff x86_64
--
Ionut
Am 19.01.2010 17:17, schrieb Ignacio Galmarino:
> On 01/19/2010 12:42 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> bump to latest bugfix version.
>> Please signoff both arches,
>>
>> greetings
>> tpowa
>>
> After grub the first message i get is:
>
> Error binding control socket, seems udevd is
On 01/19/2010 12:42 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Hi guys,
bump to latest bugfix version.
Please signoff both arches,
greetings
tpowa
After grub the first message i get is:
Error binding control socket, seems udevd is already running.
Everything else seems to work ok
x86_64
Ignacio
23 matches
Mail list logo
