On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Damjan Georgievski schrieb:
>>
>> I use userui (since I use a TuxOnIce patched kernel) .. and I'm
>> updateing this package myself too.
>>
>> Recently /usr/sbin/tuxoniceui_fbsplash can't be compiled on Arch since
>> the Arch freetype package
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 11:29 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>
>> We should really drop this hwd stuff. Apparently some howtos still
>> recommend using "hwd -xa" to generate xorg.conf, but this command
>> will
>> generate a bloated configuration f
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Eric Bélanger schrieb:
>>
>> lshwd:
>> Package in the repo is at the latest stable (few years old). There's a
>> newer rc release but : do we still need this? It's still popular
>> (25.39 %) though so I could always update it to the rc rel
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Damjan Georgievski schrieb:
>>
>> I use userui (since I use a TuxOnIce patched kernel) .. and I'm
>> updateing this package myself too.
>>
>> Recently /usr/sbin/tuxoniceui_fbsplash can't be compiled on Arch since
>> the Arch freetype package
Damjan Georgievski schrieb:
I use userui (since I use a TuxOnIce patched kernel) .. and I'm
updateing this package myself too.
Recently /usr/sbin/tuxoniceui_fbsplash can't be compiled on Arch since
the Arch freetype package doesn't include the static (.a) library.
So I can test an updated pack
> Lately, I've been updating out-of-date orphans. So far I did the ones
> that were easy to update/test so this is a status report on the
> remaining ones. The purpose here is, ideally, to find maintainers for
> them or at least testers (devs or users).
>
> BTW, make sure that you are listed as ma
6 matches
Mail list logo