On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 8:05 PM riveravaldez via arch-general
wrote:
> So, the problem is solved. Should I mark 'SOLVED' in some place or
> something like that? Couldn't find some explanation on the Wiki and
> Forum, so, let me know if I must, please.
>
> Thanks a lot!
No need (no way, in fact)
On 10/19/19, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote:
> If your kernel issue was making you not do any updates at all, this
> seems... suboptimal as you then get no updates at all. The kernel is the
> one package it is completely okay to not upgrade with the rest of your
> system, since it doesn't exa
On 10/19/19 8:53 PM, riveravaldez via arch-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> because of this problem [1] (apparently a kernel/driver/hardware
> issue?) I'm forced to stay on linux-5.2.14-arch2-1 right now.
> My question is: should/can I anyway install the 'base' package anyway
> as explained in [2]?
>
> Tha
You don't need to install the Linux package. I think generally that's why
it was removed from base. You might look into using pacman.conf IgnorePkg
to prevent upgrades... But I will try to post on that thread, it may not be
an issue with the kernel. So check there shortly
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019, 6:5
On 10/19/19 9:53 PM, riveravaldez via arch-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> because of this problem [1] (apparently a kernel/driver/hardware
> issue?) I'm forced to stay on linux-5.2.14-arch2-1 right now.
> My question is: should/can I anyway install the 'base' package anyway
> as explained in [2]?
>
> T
5 matches
Mail list logo
