Re: [arch-general] usbguard package neglected

2020-10-27 Thread Justin Capella via arch-general
You can build the latest yourself https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/usbguard-git/ but it is good that Levente is being diligent in verifying the new maintainers. On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:31 AM arch user via arch-general < arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 27.10.20 03:45, Eli Schwartz via

Re: [arch-general] usbguard package neglected

2020-10-27 Thread arch user via arch-general
On 27.10.20 03:45, Eli Schwartz via arch-general wrote: > The point of a signing key is to say "this key certifies the correct > software and I commit to using it. Anything else is automatically > suspect as malware". > > You don't immediately respond by saying "well it came from the same > websit

Re: [arch-general] usbguard package neglected

2020-10-26 Thread Eli Schwartz via arch-general
On 10/26/20 10:36 AM, arch user via arch-general wrote: > Sorry for the late answer but I had a second thought about it recently > and have found several reasons why to update USBGuard anyway: > > 1) It is open source. If there are trust issues one can look at the > source code and check what has

Re: [arch-general] usbguard package neglected

2020-10-26 Thread arch user via arch-general
On 25.06.20 00:37, Levente Polyak via arch-general wrote: > The trust chain is broken as the signing key changed and after multiple > back and forth I still did not get a signed confirmation of the old key > regarding the new maintainers and keys. > > I will try to re ping them with w 5th mail, le

Re: [arch-general] usbguard package neglected

2020-06-24 Thread Levente Polyak via arch-general
On 6/24/20 11:37 PM, arch user via arch-general wrote: > Hello, > > the package usbguard was flagged out of date in november. Three new > versions came out since then. A package update or any info on this would > be greatly appreciated. > > Kind regards > The trust chain is broken as the signin

[arch-general] usbguard package neglected

2020-06-24 Thread arch user via arch-general
Hello, the package usbguard was flagged out of date in november. Three new versions came out since then. A package update or any info on this would be greatly appreciated. Kind regards

Re: [arch-general] usbguard

2020-05-15 Thread Jan Fader
Hi Frank Am Fri 15. May. 2020, hat Frank geschrieben: > So running usbguard allow-device -p 19 gives now > the following error: > IPC ERROR: request id=1: FileRuleSet saving: /etc/usbguard/rules.conf: > Read-only file system Adding -/etc/usbguard/rules.conf to the ReadWritePaths in /usr/lib/syst

Re: [arch-general] usbguard

2020-05-15 Thread Frank
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:20:15PM +0200, Frank wrote: Good evening, 19: block id 058f:6387 serial "50624E36" name "Mass Storage" hash "icy/i6K1xnkICYPmiNNwJ18cmu5GqfsHSjCGuC5WIXg=" parent-hash "oDU77vx1EsfYlDoXkU7iWjsvmBNCDNTcCHp/V0hIFXc=" via-port "2-1.2" with-interface 08:06:50 with-connect

Re: [arch-general] usbguard

2020-05-15 Thread Tobias Hunger via arch-general
Hi Frank, On Fri, May 15, 2020, 22:23 Frank wrote: > The drive is plugged and usbguard list-devices gives the following > output: > 19: block id 058f:6387 serial "50624E36" name "Mass Storage" hash > "icy/i6K1xnkICYPmiNNwJ18cmu5GqfsHSjCGuC5WIXg=" parent-hash > "oDU77vx1EsfYlDoXkU7iWjsvmBNCDNTcCH

[arch-general] usbguard

2020-05-15 Thread Frank
Good evening, I'm trying to make usbgard work. I created the initial rules set with usbguard generate-policy > /etc/usbguard/rules.conf and started the usbguard.service. Now I testing it with a USB flash drive but am failing to make it work. The drive is plugged and usbguard list-devices gives