Re: [arch-general] update problem maybe ..

2012-06-07 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 00:52:31 -0500 Myra Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:08 PM, P .NIKOLIC > wrote: > > On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:52:25 -0500 > > "David C. Rankin" wrote: > > > >> On 06/07/2012 02:35 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > >> > Thanks folks    .. > >> > > >> > Now to tackle the laptop and

Re: [arch-general] update problem maybe ..

2012-06-07 Thread Myra Nelson
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:08 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:52:25 -0500 > "David C. Rankin" wrote: > >> On 06/07/2012 02:35 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote: >> > Thanks folks    .. >> > >> > Now to tackle the laptop and get it ready for a couple of months >> > duty whilst laid up in dang hosp

Re: [arch-general] update problem maybe ..

2012-06-07 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:52:25 -0500 "David C. Rankin" wrote: > On 06/07/2012 02:35 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > > Thanks folks.. > > > > Now to tackle the laptop and get it ready for a couple of months > > duty whilst laid up in dang hospital .. > > > > Pete . > > Advise, > >'Stay out of the

Re: [arch-general] update problem maybe ..

2012-06-07 Thread David C. Rankin
On 06/07/2012 02:35 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote: Thanks folks.. Now to tackle the laptop and get it ready for a couple of months duty whilst laid up in dang hospital .. Pete . Advise, 'Stay out of the hospital!' -> they only make you sicker there... Good luck and a speedy recovery. -- Davi

Re: [arch-general] update problem maybe ..

2012-06-07 Thread P .NIKOLIC
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:04:10 +0100 "P .NIKOLIC" wrote: > Hi > > Just done a "pacman -Syu" i get the following error below > is there a recomended way around the problem of var/lock and var/run > is it safe to delete them to update . > > > > resolving dependencies... > looking for inter-con

Re: [arch-general] update problem maybe ..

2012-06-07 Thread Geoffroy PLANQUART
On Jun 7, 2012, at 9:08 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:04 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote: >> Hi >> >> Just done a "pacman -Syu" i get the following error below >> is there a recomended way around the problem of var/lock and var/run >> is it safe to delete them to update . >> >> >

Re: [arch-general] update problem maybe ..

2012-06-07 Thread Geoffroy PLANQUART
On Jun 7, 2012, at 9:06 PM, Kacper Żuk wrote: > W dniu 07.06.2012 21:04, P .NIKOLIC pisze: >> Hi >> >> Just done a "pacman -Syu" i get the following error below >> is there a recomended way around the problem of var/lock and var/run >> is it safe to delete them to update . >> > > Check > ht

Re: [arch-general] update problem maybe ..

2012-06-07 Thread mike cloaked
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:04 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > Hi > > Just done a "pacman -Syu"  i get the following error below > is there a recomended way around the problem of  var/lock and var/run > is it safe to delete them to update . > > According to the posts I saw the way forward is to do (as root):

Re: [arch-general] update problem maybe ..

2012-06-07 Thread Javier Vasquez
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:04 PM, P .NIKOLIC wrote: > Hi > > Just done a "pacman -Syu"  i get the following error below > ... > > Targets (6): filesystem-2012.6-2  git-1.7.10.4-1  icu-49.1.2-1 > krb5-1.10.2-1 libsystemd-185-1  systemd-tools-185-1 > > ... > 100% error: failed to commit transaction (c

Re: [arch-general] update problem maybe ..

2012-06-07 Thread Kacper Żuk
W dniu 07.06.2012 21:04, P .NIKOLIC pisze: Hi Just done a "pacman -Syu" i get the following error below is there a recomended way around the problem of var/lock and var/run is it safe to delete them to update . Check http://www.archlinux.org/news/filesystem-upgrade-manual-intervention-requ

[arch-general] update problem maybe ..

2012-06-07 Thread P .NIKOLIC
Hi Just done a "pacman -Syu" i get the following error below is there a recomended way around the problem of var/lock and var/run is it safe to delete them to update . resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... Targets (6): filesystem-2012.6-2 git-1.7.10.4-1 icu-49.1.2-1 kr