On 05/07/2016 01:08 PM, Abderrahman Najjar wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Carsten Mattner
> wrote:
>
>> tc-play
>
>
> Why not VeraCrypt?
>
For cryptography its also about trust and TrueCrypt still has zero
problems that are related to its cryptographic security.
I don't say Vera
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Carsten Mattner
wrote:
> tc-play
Why not VeraCrypt?
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Antonio Rojas wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Wulf Richartz wrote:
>
>> Hello devs and list,
>>
>> truecrypt 1:7.1a-3 is broken now for five month since the gcc ABI change
>> and recompilation of truecrypt. Corresponding bug report:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Wulf Richartz wrote:
> Hello devs and list,
>
> truecrypt 1:7.1a-3 is broken now for five month since the gcc ABI change
> and recompilation of truecrypt. Corresponding bug report:
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/47325
>
> It would be fine, if t
Hello devs and list,
truecrypt 1:7.1a-3 is broken now for five month since the gcc ABI change
and recompilation of truecrypt. Corresponding bug report:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/47325
It would be fine, if there will be a "solution" for this package in the
repository Extra, maybe going back
5 matches
Mail list logo