On 2013-8-15，19:55，Damjan wrote：
> On 13.08.2013 18:43, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Hi :)
>>
>> when I try to build current linux-rt I get "No space left on device",
>> resp. df shows "tmpfs 100% /tmp".
>>
>
> setup yaourt to not build in /tmp ?
>
Use the --tmp option as you can see in the man pag
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> Notice, though, that if /tmp is getting full and is about the same size as
> RAM,
> the system will start swapping well before /tmp is filled, so you'll get no
> performance gain from building in /tmp because effectively you'll be
> compiling
On 13 August 2013 17:43, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> when I try to build current linux-rt I get "No space left on device",
> resp. df shows "tmpfs 100% /tmp".
>
> What can I do?
> Add "tmpfs /tmp tmpfs nodev,nosuid,size=3G 0 0"
> to /etc/fstab?
> What should somebody do,
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 13:55 +0200, Damjan wrote:
> setup yaourt to not build in /tmp ?
Thank you,
good to know assumed I should experience this issue on a machine with
less RAM.
Building the kernel worked, after adding a line to fstab.
$ grep tmpfs /etc/fstab
tmpfs /tmp tmpfs nodev,
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 08:59 -0400, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:43:29 +0200
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > Hi :)
> >
> > when I try to build current linux-rt I get "No space left on device",
> > resp. df shows "tmpfs 100% /tmp".
> >
> > What can I do?
> > Add "tmpfs /tmp
when I try to build current linux-rt I get "No space left on device",
resp. df shows "tmpfs 100% /tmp".
What can I do?
Add "tmpfs /tmp tmpfs nodev,nosuid,size=3G 0 0"
to /etc/fstab?
What should somebody do, assumed there are only 2 GB available by RAM?
That's not a problem
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:43:29 +0200
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> when I try to build current linux-rt I get "No space left on device",
> resp. df shows "tmpfs 100% /tmp".
>
> What can I do?
> Add "tmpfs /tmp tmpfs nodev,nosuid,size=3G 0 0"
> to /etc/fstab?
> What should
On 13.08.2013 18:43, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hi :)
when I try to build current linux-rt I get "No space left on device",
resp. df shows "tmpfs 100% /tmp".
setup yaourt to not build in /tmp ?
--
дамјан
Hi :)
when I try to build current linux-rt I get "No space left on device",
resp. df shows "tmpfs 100% /tmp".
What can I do?
Add "tmpfs /tmp tmpfs nodev,nosuid,size=3G 0 0"
to /etc/fstab?
What should somebody do, assumed there are only 2 GB available by RAM?
I could build t
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 01:47 +0900, Juan Diego wrote:
> I wanted to remove them because I was cleaning my fstab of old entries
> that I dont use anymore, so I found those two in the middle of the
> way, I guess they will have to stay there
Bottom-posting, please...
And yes, I've wanted to remove t
I wanted to remove them because I was cleaning my fstab of old entries
that I dont use anymore, so I found those two in the middle of the
way, I guess they will have to stay there
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 25.03.2010 17:12, schrieb Xavier Chantry:
>> On Thu, Mar
Am 25.03.2010 17:12, schrieb Xavier Chantry:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>
>> This is definitely NOT SAFE!
>>
>> If you don't have /dev/shm, POSIX shared memory will use the same tmpfs
>> filesystem as /dev, which is currently limited to 10MB - POSIX shared
>> memory
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
> This is definitely NOT SAFE!
>
> If you don't have /dev/shm, POSIX shared memory will use the same tmpfs
> filesystem as /dev, which is currently limited to 10MB - POSIX shared
> memory blocks might be much larger.
>
> As for removing /dev
Am 25.03.2010 16:53, schrieb Juan Diego:
> Good day everyone,
>
> I want to delete the next two lines from my fstab:
>
> none /dev/pts devpts defaults 0 0
> none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
>
> however I would like to know the secondary effects of doing such
> thing, all the information I could
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 00:53 +0900, Juan Diego wrote:
> Good day everyone,
>
> I want to delete the next two lines from my fstab:
>
> none /dev/pts devpts defaults 0 0
> none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
>
> however I would like to know the secondary effects of doing such
> thing, all the informat
Good day everyone,
I want to delete the next two lines from my fstab:
none /dev/pts devpts defaults 0 0
none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
however I would like to know the secondary effects of doing such
thing, all the information I could get on the internet is that shm is
for POSIX shared memory
16 matches
Mail list logo
