Jan de Groot wrote:
Did someone try to remove the optimization flags from the mozconfig file
already? I've read a recent blogpost from a mozilla dev about
distribution changes to mozilla products where the default compiler
flags should give the best results, as every part of
thunderbird/firefox/x
2008/5/22 Alper KANAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Once again, we came to a conclusion that thunderbird-2.0.0.14 should have
> stayed in [testing] for a while until it's stable enough to make it into
> [extra]..
>
Once again, this is a problem with thunderbird and gcc 4.3. It is not
specific to thunderb
Once again, we came to a conclusion that thunderbird-2.0.0.14 should
have stayed in [testing] for a while until it's stable enough to make it
into [extra]..
Alper KANAT
http://raptiye.org
Allan McRae yazmış:
For those wanting to work around this while waiting for an official
solution:
gcc
For those wanting to work around this while waiting for an official
solution:
gcc-42 package (i686):
http://allan.mcrae.googlepages.com/gcc-42-4.2.3-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
gcc-42 PKGBUILD: http://allan.mcrae.googlepages.com/PKGBUILD (not x86_64
tested but I think it should work)
This installs alon
Jan de Groot wrote:
Did someone try to remove the optimization flags from the mozconfig file
already? I've read a recent blogpost from a mozilla dev about
distribution changes to mozilla products where the default compiler
flags should give the best results, as every part of
thunderbird/firefox/
the attachment problem occurs because of that it's compiled with gcc-4.3 ??
2008/5/22 Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Alper KANAT wrote:
>
>> Why don't you guys use thunderbird-branded-2.0.0.14 package on AUR ?
>>
>> Because that is built from source with gcc-4.3 so will have the same
> prob
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 23:50 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> Alper KANAT wrote:
> > Why don't you guys use thunderbird-branded-2.0.0.14 package on AUR ?
> >
> Because that is built from source with gcc-4.3 so will have the same
> problem.
Did someone try to remove the optimization flags from the mozco
Alper KANAT wrote:
Why don't you guys use thunderbird-branded-2.0.0.14 package on AUR ?
Because that is built from source with gcc-4.3 so will have the same
problem.
Why don't you guys use thunderbird-branded-2.0.0.14 package on AUR ?
2008/5/22 Petr Ullmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Allan McRae napsal(a):
>
>> Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
I can confirm it does not h
Here it is
http://cave0.tl.krakow.pl/~ert16/thunderbird-2.0.0.12-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
Petr Ullmann pisze:
>
>
> Allan McRae napsal(a):
>> Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Allan McRae
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
I can confirm it does not happen with the of
Allan McRae napsal(a):
Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Allan McRae
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can confirm it does not happen with the official binaries,
although the
icons do not show but that could be because I ran it from my home
directory.
I have also rebu
Xavier wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can confirm it does not happen with the official binaries, although the
icons do not show but that could be because I ran it from my home directory.
I have also rebuilt via abs to get branding and that do
Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can confirm it does not happen with the official binaries, although the
icons do not show but that could be because I ran it from my home directory.
I have also rebuilt via abs to get branding
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can confirm it does not happen with the official binaries, although the
> icons do not show but that could be because I ran it from my home directory.
> I have also rebuilt via abs to get branding and that does not help.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Schaefer wrote:
>>
>> On 20.05.2008 13:07, Xavier wrote:
>>>
>>> It might also be interesting to see what happens with mozilla binaries
>>> (just download thunderbird for linux from mozilla site).
>>
>> Unfortunately
Michael Schaefer wrote:
On 20.05.2008 13:07, Xavier wrote:
It might also be interesting to see what happens with mozilla binaries
(just download thunderbird for linux from mozilla site).
Unfortunately i don't have the time to debug this at the moment cause
i'm quiet busy. but when rebooting a
On 20.05.2008 13:07, Xavier wrote:
It might also be interesting to see what happens with mozilla binaries
(just download thunderbird for linux from mozilla site).
i tried the thunderbird 2.0.0.14 binary from mozilla.org now and it
works perfect for me. everything works as expected.
cheers -
On 20.05.2008 13:07, Xavier wrote:
It might also be interesting to see what happens with mozilla binaries
(just download thunderbird for linux from mozilla site).
Unfortunately i don't have the time to debug this at the moment cause
i'm quiet busy. but when rebooting and x shutting down i saw
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Michael Schaefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There seems to be something really wrong. Could you do me a davor and
> send my your thunderbird 2.0.0.12 package from your cache via email?
> Unfortunately i flushed my cache some days ago and can't find the old
> 12er
There seems to be something really wrong. Could you do me a davor and
send my your thunderbird 2.0.0.12 package from your cache via email?
Unfortunately i flushed my cache some days ago and can't find the old
12er package anywhere.
thank you in advance - Michael
On 20.05.2008 12:55, ert256 wrote
I have opposite problem after upgrade to 2.0.0.14
I can see JPEG attachment only, there is no text in the window.
After downgrading to 2.0.0.12 everything is back to normal.
Michael Schaefer pisze:
> Hello everybody,
>
> after upgrading to thunderbird 2.0.0.14 i cannot open attachments
> anymore
Hello everybody,
after upgrading to thunderbird 2.0.0.14 i cannot open attachments
anymore or rather see them. Before opening an email the attachment
symbol still appears in the list but when opened i just see the textbody
and the symbol (speaking about the paper-clip) disappears.
Furthermore
22 matches
Mail list logo
