Re: [arch-general] syslinux 6.01-1 issues

2013-07-07 Thread Keshav Padram
On 6 July 2013 20:21, Keshav Padram wrote: > On 5 July 2013 23:56, Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> Am 05.07.2013 20:24, schrieb Karol Blazewicz: >> > I'm using syslinux for my bootloader. I'm using BIOS, not UEFI, on a >> > 32-bit system. >> > After updating syslinux 5.10-3 -> 6.01-1 the modules' sym

Re: [arch-general] syslinux 6.01-1 issues

2013-07-07 Thread Keshav Padram
On 5 July 2013 23:56, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 05.07.2013 20:24, schrieb Karol Blazewicz: > > I'm using syslinux for my bootloader. I'm using BIOS, not UEFI, on a > > 32-bit system. > > After updating syslinux 5.10-3 -> 6.01-1 the modules' symlinks in > > /boot/syslinux didn't get updated and s

Re: [arch-general] syslinux 6.01-1 issues

2013-07-06 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 05.07.2013 20:46, schrieb Jonathan Hudson: > And if you have a custom syslinux.cfg, you need to restore than from > syslinux.cfg.pacsave. > > So many ways to break your boot That has already been fixed. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [arch-general] syslinux 6.01-1 issues

2013-07-06 Thread Jonathan Hudson
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 20:26:53 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: >Am 05.07.2013 20:24, schrieb Karol Blazewicz: >> I'm using syslinux for my bootloader. I'm using BIOS, not UEFI, on a >> 32-bit system. >> After updating syslinux 5.10-3 -> 6.01-1 the modules' symlinks in >> /boot/syslinux didn't get updat

Re: [arch-general] syslinux 6.01-1 issues

2013-07-05 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 05.07.2013 21:22, schrieb Karol Blazewicz: >> Should I open a bug report? >> If you don't plan on fixing it immediately, please post a message on >> arch-dev-public, because not everyone is reading arch-general even >> though this seems to

Re: [arch-general] syslinux 6.01-1 issues

2013-07-05 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 05.07.2013 21:22, schrieb Karol Blazewicz: > Should I open a bug report? > If you don't plan on fixing it immediately, please post a message on > arch-dev-public, because not everyone is reading arch-general even > though this seems to be only an annoyance, not a system-breaking bug. This shoul

Re: [arch-general] syslinux 6.01-1 issues

2013-07-05 Thread Karol Blazewicz
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 05.07.2013 20:24, schrieb Karol Blazewicz: >> I'm using syslinux for my bootloader. I'm using BIOS, not UEFI, on a >> 32-bit system. >> After updating syslinux 5.10-3 -> 6.01-1 the modules' symlinks in >> /boot/syslinux didn't get updated

Re: [arch-general] syslinux 6.01-1 issues

2013-07-05 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 05.07.2013 20:24, schrieb Karol Blazewicz: > I'm using syslinux for my bootloader. I'm using BIOS, not UEFI, on a > 32-bit system. > After updating syslinux 5.10-3 -> 6.01-1 the modules' symlinks in > /boot/syslinux didn't get updated and still point to > /usr/lib/syslinux/ instead of to /usr/li

[arch-general] syslinux 6.01-1 issues

2013-07-05 Thread Karol Blazewicz
I'm using syslinux for my bootloader. I'm using BIOS, not UEFI, on a 32-bit system. After updating syslinux 5.10-3 -> 6.01-1 the modules' symlinks in /boot/syslinux didn't get updated and still point to /usr/lib/syslinux/ instead of to /usr/lib/syslinux/bios e.g. menu.c32 -> /usr/lib/syslinux/menu.