Re: [arch-general] synergy-plus

2010-06-02 Thread Jonathan Brown
: Re: [arch-general] synergy-plus On 02/06/10 17:10, Jeroen Op 't Eynde wrote: > On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 02:48:08 +0200, Caleb Cushing > wrote: > >> I suppose this could be filed as a bug... but since extra/synergy has >> long been unmaintained upstream. I recently found a fork

Re: [arch-general] synergy-plus

2010-06-02 Thread Allan McRae
On 02/06/10 17:10, Jeroen Op 't Eynde wrote: On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 02:48:08 +0200, Caleb Cushing wrote: I suppose this could be filed as a bug... but since extra/synergy has long been unmaintained upstream. I recently found a fork http://code.google.com/p/synergy-plus/ for which there is already

Re: [arch-general] synergy-plus

2010-06-02 Thread Jeroen Op 't Eynde
On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 02:48:08 +0200, Caleb Cushing wrote: I suppose this could be filed as a bug... but since extra/synergy has long been unmaintained upstream. I recently found a fork http://code.google.com/p/synergy-plus/ for which there is already a pkgbuild on AUR. perhaps we should consid

[arch-general] synergy-plus

2010-06-01 Thread Caleb Cushing
I suppose this could be filed as a bug... but since extra/synergy has long been unmaintained upstream. I recently found a fork http://code.google.com/p/synergy-plus/ for which there is already a pkgbuild on AUR. perhaps we should consider relegating the original synergy to AUR and moving synergy-pl