Re: [arch-general] qemu-kvm vs. qemu upstream

2011-03-02 Thread Øyvind Heggstad
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:43:33 -0600 C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Jelle van der Waa > wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 11:07 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > >> hmm, soo qemu doesn't actually use the VT extensions?  wtf is the > >> point then? > > QEMU is an emul

Re: [arch-general] qemu-kvm vs. qemu upstream

2011-02-24 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 11:07 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote: >> hmm, soo qemu doesn't actually use the VT extensions?  wtf is the >> point then? > QEMU is an emulator -> so for ARM for example >> this is what i don't understand; if qemu

Re: [arch-general] qemu-kvm vs. qemu upstream

2011-02-24 Thread Mauro Santos
On 24-02-2011 17:07, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > hmm, soo qemu doesn't actually use the VT extensions? wtf is the > point then? this is what i don't understand; if qemu supports KVM via > the `-enable-kvm` switch why does it suck so much -- it seems just as > slow to me as no KVM support at all.

Re: [arch-general] qemu-kvm vs. qemu upstream

2011-02-24 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 11:07 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 10:33 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > >> > > >> > If this is virtualbox specific, I'd tr

Re: [arch-general] qemu-kvm vs. qemu upstream

2011-02-24 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 10:33 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >> > >> > If this is virtualbox specific, I'd try qemu-kvm. >> >> hey, >> >> i was just trying to get a concrete answer

Re: [arch-general] qemu-kvm vs. qemu upstream

2011-02-24 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 10:33 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > > > > If this is virtualbox specific, I'd try qemu-kvm. > > hey, > > i was just trying to get a concrete answer about this the other day, > so maybe you can clarify because i kee

[arch-general] qemu-kvm vs. qemu upstream

2011-02-24 Thread C Anthony Risinger
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > > If this is virtualbox specific, I'd try qemu-kvm. hey, i was just trying to get a concrete answer about this the other day, so maybe you can clarify because i keep reading conflicting and/or outdated information. AFAICS, qemu-kvm is still