On 11/24/2010 01:42 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Have you rebuild whatever package provides "createrepo" to have its modules
> available for python-2.7? They are probably still sitting in a python-26
> directory... This would have happened with or without the python3
> transition.
>
> Allan
Good
On 24/11/10 17:35, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 11/17/2010 01:32 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Alper KANAT wrote:
That's nonsense.
what is? py3k is nothing more than the completion and/or significant
advancement of several items that began in the 2.x tree; th
On 11/17/2010 01:32 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Alper KANAT wrote:
>>
>> That's nonsense.
>
> what is? py3k is nothing more than the completion and/or significant
> advancement of several items that began in the 2.x tree; this is not
> new information.
>
>>
Brendan Long wrote:
>
> References:
> http://docs.python.org/library/2to3.html
> http://diveintopython3.org/porting-code-to-python-3-with-2to3.html
Another reference
for things to consider when choosing Python2 or Python3 ...
http://wiki.python.org/moin/Python2orPython3
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Alper KANAT wrote:
>
> That's nonsense.
what is? py3k is nothing more than the completion and/or significant
advancement of several items that began in the 2.x tree; this is not
new information.
> It's correct that Arch is an advanced user distribution but
> yo
That's nonsense. It's correct that Arch is an advanced user distribution but
you can't expect everyone to workaround each py application. Not everyone
that use Arch are developers.
---
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
2010/11/12 C Anthony Risinger
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Auguste Pop
I don't know what you see under a smooth transition, but I've had to edit
the first line of a lot of apps.. (#!/usr/bin/python to #!/usr/bin/python2).
No big trouble, but trouble nonetheless.
Adrian
2010/11/12 Brendan Long
> On 11/12/2010 11:46 AM, Auguste Pop wrote:
> > Considering the incompa
On 11/12/2010 11:46 AM, Auguste Pop wrote:
> Considering the incompatibility in the fundamental print
> function/statement, I seriously doubt the number of python2 packages
> that can run under python3 without any modification.
But that's the easy part. 2to3 can automatically convert a lot of
thin
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
> The transition is indeed smooth, as least for me. I am just worrying
> that maybe most python utilities will remain using python2 for a
> rather long time.
>
> Considering the incompatibility in the fundamental print
> function/statement, I se
python3 without any modification.
Most python programmers are clearly not so interested in the
bleeding-edge technologies. That's what makes me frustrated as an Arch
user.
Best Regards,
> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:11:56 -0500
> From: Isaac Dupree
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] py
On 11/12/10 01:51, Auguste Pop wrote:
...
I hope python3 won't die this way, so that all the previous efforts in
transition to python3 will not go in vain. Maybe we just took the
transitional leap too early when nobody is ready except us.
As you note, "nobody is ready except us" -- we are ready
Hi,
Firstly, I want to state clearly that I am 100% supportive to the
python3 transition which took part in Archlinux a month ago.
I installed libreoffice from extra today to replace go-openoffice. And
all of a sudden, python is no longer required by any package at all. I
checked the dependencies
12 matches
Mail list logo
