On Monday 05 October 2009 06:26:52 am Allan McRae wrote:
> Did you read the news about php on the front page of the website?
>
Oh, you mean that one, the one you have to scroll way down (one or two mouse
scrolls) to find...
(ducking. ;-)
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
Jobs a good one then :)
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Jozsef wrote:
> LoadModule php5_module modules/libphp5.so
> Include conf/extra/php5_module.conf
>
> After adding these two lines in httpd.conf everything works fine again.
>
> --
> Best,
> Jozsef Kurucity | Web & Graphic Designer
> +971 5
LoadModule php5_module modules/libphp5.so
Include conf/extra/php5_module.conf
After adding these two lines in httpd.conf everything works fine again.
--
Best,
Jozsef Kurucity | Web & Graphic Designer
+971 50 6783113 | joz...@gmx.com
On 5 Oct 2009 at 10:32, Crouse wrote:
> When using Arch as a server distro, you HAVE to be prepared to
> revert
> packages back that bork things, php/apache/mysq/ etc. this
> isn't
> hard at all.
>
> I ran into the same php issues, and have yet to complete the
> upgrade,
> I simply reverted t
> What, specifically, do you see as more stable about BSD over Linux?
>
Nothing really... Just NetBSD is infamous for being uber stable. Linux under
severe load can behave, well strangely. I have seen BSD boxes with loads up
to 12 (Single Core as well so that's 12x optimum load) and still behave
s
On 5 Oct 2009 at 16:30, David Houston wrote:
> If you want ultimate stability use NetBSD, wouldn't recommend it for
> a
> desktop but as a Server goes its the balls! Man I got one thats been
> up for
> over a 1000days! I think what I'm trying to say in a round about
> fashion is
> this...
>
> I t
On 10/05/2009 11:30 AM, David Houston wrote:
If you want ultimate stability use NetBSD, wouldn't recommend it for a
desktop but as a Server goes its the balls! Man I got one thats been up for
over a 1000days!
Getting OT a bit, I know, but just wondering:
What, specifically, do you see as more
When using Arch as a server distro, you HAVE to be prepared to revert
packages back that bork things, php/apache/mysq/ etc. this isn't
hard at all.
I ran into the same php issues, and have yet to complete the upgrade,
I simply reverted the package back, and set it to ignore in the
upgrade list
> :) You are right about Linux. Arch is the best for sure. And I tried
> already many linux distros. Didn't try them all of course, but many
> of them I did. Maybe Sabayon and Pardus are worth of try. Will see
> about that later.
> But what I didn't try yet is BSD. I mean for longer period of time,
On 5 Oct 2009 at 18:43, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> >> Was thiking about PC-BSD.
>
> >Thats a toy!
>
> Let's give him a chance to sort out more distros and come back to arch :)
:) You are right about Linux. Arch is the best for sure. And I tried
already many linux distros. Didn't try them all o
>> Was thiking about PC-BSD.
>Thats a toy!
Let's give him a chance to sort out more distros and come back to arch :)
On 5 Oct 2009 at 14:18, David Houston wrote:
> > I like that it is bleeding edge but still it's not testing version.
> > What is the function of Arch distro? For fun?
> >
>
> Your kidding right? KISS I think that Arch functions really well at
> being bleeding edge and stable.. further more...
> I like that it is bleeding edge but still it's not testing version.
> What is the function of Arch distro? For fun?
>
Your kidding right? KISS I think that Arch functions really well at
being bleeding edge and stable.. further more your using aur. Not that
there is anything wrong with th
On 5 Oct 2009 at 16:19, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> >> Karma or not, I need a good, stable and working OS.
>
> Arch is bleeding edge, not stable.
>
> btw you may try Rock Stable Arch (if it is still alive)
I like that it is bleeding edge but still it's not testing version.
What is the function of
>> Karma or not, I need a good, stable and working OS.
Arch is bleeding edge, not stable.
btw you may try Rock Stable Arch (if it is still alive)
On 5 Oct 2009 at 15:46, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
> This is your karma or badly synced mirror. :)
>
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Jozsef wrote:
> > Yes i read that and I did that changes last time I did -Syu and
> > apache and PHP start working again. But last night it didn't happen.
> > I just
This is your karma or badly synced mirror. :)
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Jozsef wrote:
> Yes i read that and I did that changes last time I did -Syu and
> apache and PHP start working again. But last night it didn't happen.
> I just didn't try to do anything regarding:
> *module path is now
On 5 Oct 2009 at 21:26, Allan McRae wrote:
> It would be best to start a new thread rather than replying to a
> completely unrelated one.
>
>
> Jozsef wrote:
> > Last night after I did yaourt -Syu my php stopped working and this
> > time I din't see any news about things I should fix to get it
It would be best to start a new thread rather than replying to a
completely unrelated one.
Jozsef wrote:
Last night after I did yaourt -Syu my php stopped working and this
time I din't see any news about things I should fix to get it working
again.
Did you read the news about php on the fr
19 matches
Mail list logo
