On 24/01/19 9:54 am, Amish wrote:
On 24/01/19 2:46 am, ProgAndy wrote:
Am 23.01.19 um 22:08 schrieb Andy Pieters:
Any of you seen the news about php-pear?
There's an AUR package that downloads from pear.php.net so if that was
within the last 6 months it could have been the compromised one
On 24/01/19 2:46 am, ProgAndy wrote:
Am 23.01.19 um 22:08 schrieb Andy Pieters:
Any of you seen the news about php-pear?
There's an AUR package that downloads from pear.php.net so if that was
within the last 6 months it could have been the compromised one?
https://thehackernews.com/2019/01/
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:16 PM ProgAndy wrote:
> Please read the note in the aur comments.
>
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-pear/
> Pierre commented on 2019-01-20 08:55
>
> > Warning: The change in checksum was due to a security breach > at
> PEAR. The PEAR installer was tainted:
> > h
Am 23.01.19 um 22:08 schrieb Andy Pieters:
> Any of you seen the news about php-pear?
>
> There's an AUR package that downloads from pear.php.net so if that was
> within the last 6 months it could have been the compromised one?
>
> https://thehackernews.com/2019/01/php-pear-hacked.html
>
Pleas
Any of you seen the news about php-pear?
There's an AUR package that downloads from pear.php.net so if that was
within the last 6 months it could have been the compromised one?
https://thehackernews.com/2019/01/php-pear-hacked.html
5 matches
Mail list logo