On 17 June 2010 17:48, julroy67 wrote:
> You're right, it was AUR version that I maintained, the first release of
> libvpx provided only the static lib, and unfortunately, it seems that the
> libvpx package in extra don't replace the AUR package that is now deleted.
Remember, official packages ne
You're right, it was AUR version that I maintained, the first release of
libvpx provided only the static lib, and unfortunately, it seems that the
libvpx package in extra don't replace the AUR package that is now deleted.
2010/6/17 PT M.
> ok i got it, i somehow have libvpx 0.9.0-4 installed (ca
ok i got it, i somehow have libvpx 0.9.0-4 installed (cant remember form
where, maybe aur?), with no libvpx.so.0 provided. i reinstall libvpx from
extra and everything's fine
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:39 AM, PT M. wrote:
> > after recent u
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:39 AM, PT M. wrote:
> after recent update, mplayer failed to load with such error:
>
> $ mplayer
>> mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libvpx.so.0: cannot open
>> shared object file: No such file or directory
>>
>
> this so i think is supposed by libvpx, but:
after recent update, mplayer failed to load with such error:
$ mplayer
> mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libvpx.so.0: cannot open
> shared object file: No such file or directory
>
this so i think is supposed by libvpx, but:
$ pacman -Ql libvpx|grep /usr/lib
> libvpx /usr/lib/
> li
5 matches
Mail list logo
