>
> Anatol,
>
> Here is a source package building libxml2 2.9.1. It took less than 5 minutes
> to
> modify the official repo PKGBUILD and build the new version.
>
> I haven't tested all software depending on libxml2 but I have installed it
> myself and so far so good everything works perfectly for
> >
> > I believe the next question is "Hussam, Jan is there anything we can
> > do to make libxml2 upgrade happen?"
>
> Let me put this statement other way: I have some time that I would like to
> contribute it back to Linux Arch. Trying to resolve libxml2 upgrade issues
> seems a useful task. Cou
On 05/02/2013 03:20 AM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Anatol Pomozov
wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote:
Hi,
Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not b
Hi
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Anatol Pomozov
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
>> On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been
>>> updated from 2.8 to 2.9
Hi
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been
>> updated from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)?
>>
>> Regards
>
> As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot o
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 04:05:34PM -0700, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot of applications.
>
> Do you have list of applications that are broken? Could it be "fixed"
> by recompiling those applications against 2.9.X?
>
> I see that upcoming ubuntu is using 2.9.0
> h
Hi
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been
>> updated from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)?
>>
>> Regards
>
> As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot o
On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been
> updated from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)?
>
> Regards
As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot of applications.
Hi,
Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been updated
from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)?
Regards
--
Ross Lagerwall
9 matches
Mail list logo