Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date

2013-05-07 Thread LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT
> > Anatol, > > Here is a source package building libxml2 2.9.1. It took less than 5 minutes > to > modify the official repo PKGBUILD and build the new version. > > I haven't tested all software depending on libxml2 but I have installed it > myself and so far so good everything works perfectly for

Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date

2013-05-07 Thread LANGLOIS Olivier PIS -EXT
> > > > I believe the next question is "Hussam, Jan is there anything we can > > do to make libxml2 upgrade happen?" > > Let me put this statement other way: I have some time that I would like to > contribute it back to Linux Arch. Trying to resolve libxml2 upgrade issues > seems a useful task. Cou

Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date

2013-05-02 Thread Armin K.
On 05/02/2013 03:20 AM, Anatol Pomozov wrote: Hi On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote: Hi On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote: Hi, Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not b

Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date

2013-05-01 Thread Anatol Pomozov
Hi On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: >> On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been >>> updated from 2.8 to 2.9

Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date

2013-04-25 Thread Anatol Pomozov
Hi On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been >> updated from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)? >> >> Regards > > As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot o

Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date

2013-04-23 Thread Ross Lagerwall
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 04:05:34PM -0700, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > > As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot of applications. > > Do you have list of applications that are broken? Could it be "fixed" > by recompiling those applications against 2.9.X? > > I see that upcoming ubuntu is using 2.9.0 > h

Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date

2013-04-23 Thread Anatol Pomozov
Hi On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote: > On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been >> updated from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)? >> >> Regards > > As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot o

Re: [arch-general] libxml2 out of date

2013-04-23 Thread Hussam Al-Tayeb
On Tuesday 23 April 2013 09:05:33 Ross Lagerwall wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been > updated from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)? > > Regards As far as I can tell, it breaks a lot of applications.

[arch-general] libxml2 out of date

2013-04-23 Thread Ross Lagerwall
Hi, Is there a reason (other than lack of time) that libxml2 has not been updated from 2.8 to 2.9 (now 2.9.1)? Regards -- Ross Lagerwall