Re: [arch-general] libvirt and VirtualBox

2016-03-03 Thread Jukka Salmi
Jukka Salmi --> arch-general (2016-03-03 16:11:01 +0100): > Damjan Georgievski --> arch-general (2016-03-03 14:43:03 +0100): > > since the update of libvirt to 1.3.2, it seems the sd_notify support > > is broken, and the daemon is killed. > > > > is the daemon even running for you? > > Hmm, this

Re: [arch-general] libvirt and VirtualBox

2016-03-03 Thread Jukka Salmi
Damjan Georgievski --> arch-general (2016-03-03 14:43:03 +0100): > since the update of libvirt to 1.3.2, it seems the sd_notify support > is broken, and the daemon is killed. > > is the daemon even running for you? Hmm, this seems to be another issue, because the issue I was talking about (`virsh

Re: [arch-general] libvirt and VirtualBox

2016-03-03 Thread Damjan Georgievski
since the update of libvirt to 1.3.2, it seems the sd_notify support is broken, and the daemon is killed. is the daemon even running for you? On 3 March 2016 at 14:37, Jukka Salmi wrote: > Hello > > On an up-to-date Arch x86-64 system, I fail to manage VirtualBox VMs > with libvirt virsh: > > $

[arch-general] libvirt and VirtualBox

2016-03-03 Thread Jukka Salmi
Hello On an up-to-date Arch x86-64 system, I fail to manage VirtualBox VMs with libvirt virsh: $ virsh -c vbox:///session error: failed to connect to the hypervisor error: internal error: unable to initialize VirtualBox driver API Is this supposed to work out of the box? Both VirtualBox (5.0.14