Re: [arch-general] hunspell-en

2016-04-08 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Hi Eli, On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:35:51 -0400, Eli Schwartz wrote: >On 04/08/2016 01:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/48839 > >It isn't broken for me... According to that bug report, Claws is >interpreting a *.dic file to say that the first word in a sentence >should not

Re: [arch-general] hunspell-en

2016-04-08 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 04/08/2016 01:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi, > > is there a reason that hunspell-en is likely broken all the times, after > there was the switch to the new version scheme? > > A bug against the new package is already reported: > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/48839 > > $ downgrade hunspe

[arch-general] hunspell-en

2016-04-08 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Hi, is there a reason that hunspell-en is likely broken all the times, after there was the switch to the new version scheme? A bug against the new package is already reported: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/48839 $ downgrade hunspell-en Available packages: 1) hunspell-en-2016.01.19-1-