On 03/03/2010, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> Now there is one remaining question: may I assume
> that when shadow is updated in [core] the groupmod
> bug will be fixed (it effectively renders groupmod
> useless) ?
>
> I see three possibles outcomes:
>
> * Yes.
> * Depends on the maintainer of that
You can also get em from ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/sources/
But I think that's only for < GPL3.
--
GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
On 03/01/2010 05:03 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
>
> Step 1:
> [dar...@daroselin ~]$ which groupmod
> /usr/sbin/groupmod
>
> Step 2:
> [dar...@daroselin ~]$ pacman -Qo /usr/sbin/groupmod
> /usr/sbin/groupmod is owned by shadow 4.1.4.2-1
>
> Step 2.5 (if your abs is not up to date):
> [dar...@da
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 10:38:55AM -0500, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> >You can, using repos.archlinux.org
>
> ???
>
> I think the OP was saying that he wanted the source code for the
> app. repos.archlinux.org only holds PKGBUILD scripts, not the app's
> source code.
Correct, but then makepkg -
On 03/01/2010 07:55 PM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 00:56 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 06:03:54PM -0500, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
Step 1:
...
...
HTH,
Very much, thanks !
I was imagining some way to get individual packages,
clearly that was a wrong
On 03/01/2010 02:29 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:32:15AM -0700, jwbirdsong wrote:
Patch shadow your self w/ aforementioned gentoo patch. works fine
after building w/ the patch.
(maybe a completely stupid question)
Is there a systematic way to get the
David C. Rankin (2010-03-01 17:03):
> On 03/01/2010 12:32 PM, jwbirdsong wrote:
> >> Quick Question:
> >>
> >>How do we change group information while this bug is there? Do we
> >> disable pam
> >> or do we just edit /etc/group in the interim?
> >>
> >>
> > Patch shadow your self w/ aforeme
Ng Oon-Ee (2010-03-02 08:55):
> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 00:56 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 06:03:54PM -0500, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> >
> > > Step 1:
> > > ...
> > > ...
> > > HTH,
> >
> > Very much, thanks !
> >
> > I was imagining some way to get individual p
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 00:56 +0100, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 06:03:54PM -0500, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
>
> > Step 1:
> > ...
> > ...
> > HTH,
>
> Very much, thanks !
>
> I was imagining some way to get individual packages,
> clearly that was a wrong assumption.
>
>
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 06:03:54PM -0500, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Step 1:
> ...
> ...
> HTH,
Very much, thanks !
I was imagining some way to get individual packages,
clearly that was a wrong assumption.
Ciao,
--
FA
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
On 03/01/2010 12:32 PM, jwbirdsong wrote:
>> Quick Question:
>>
>>How do we change group information while this bug is there? Do we
>> disable pam
>> or do we just edit /etc/group in the interim?
>>
>>
> Patch shadow your self w/ aforementioned gentoo patch. works fine
> after building w/
On 03/01/2010 04:29 PM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:32:15AM -0700, jwbirdsong wrote:
Patch shadow your self w/ aforementioned gentoo patch. works fine
after building w/ the patch.
(maybe a completely stupid question)
Is there a systematic way to get the source ve
If you run ABS, check the wiki[1] or search for the package on the web page.
[1] http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ABS
On 1 March 2010 21:42, Tavian Barnes wrote:
> On 1 March 2010 16:29, wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:32:15AM -0700, jwbirdsong wrote:
>>
>>> Patch shadow your self w/ a
On 1 March 2010 16:29, wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:32:15AM -0700, jwbirdsong wrote:
>
>> Patch shadow your self w/ aforementioned gentoo patch. works fine
>> after building w/ the patch.
>
> (maybe a completely stupid question)
>
> Is there a systematic way to get the source version of
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 11:32:15AM -0700, jwbirdsong wrote:
> Patch shadow your self w/ aforementioned gentoo patch. works fine
> after building w/ the patch.
(maybe a completely stupid question)
Is there a systematic way to get the source version of
an Arch package ?
Searching AUR for 'grou
On 02/28/2010 03:23 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On 02/28/2010 03:45 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
Two things "Wohoo, I'm free! - last home server moved to Arch!" and second, Arch
has the same bug in the source of shadow src/groupmod.c that renders groupmod
unusable with pam enabled:
[15:
On 02/28/2010 04:27 PM, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> 2010/2/28, David C. Rankin :
>> I apologize if this has already been brought to your attention. Let me know
>> if
>> you want me to open a ticket.
>
> Fill a bug report, if you think that is a bug.
>
>
Done: FS#18516 http://bugs.archlinux.o
On 02/28/2010 04:27 PM, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> 2010/2/28, David C. Rankin :
>> I apologize if this has already been brought to your attention. Let me know
>> if
>> you want me to open a ticket.
>
> Fill a bug report, if you think that is a bug.
>
>
Will do - no thinking about it, it 'is'
2010/2/28, David C. Rankin :
> I apologize if this has already been brought to your attention. Let me know
> if
> you want me to open a ticket.
Fill a bug report, if you think that is a bug.
--
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it
On 02/28/2010 03:45 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Two things "Wohoo, I'm free! - last home server moved to Arch!" and second,
> Arch
> has the same bug in the source of shadow src/groupmod.c that renders groupmod
> unusable with pam enabled:
>
> [15:23 nirvana:/home/david] # groupmod -g
Guys,
Two things "Wohoo, I'm free! - last home server moved to Arch!" and second, Arch
has the same bug in the source of shadow src/groupmod.c that renders groupmod
unusable with pam enabled:
[15:23 nirvana:/home/david] # groupmod -g1060 david
groupmod: Cannot determine your user name.
[15:25 ni
21 matches
Mail list logo
