On 05/01/2015 10:09, Daniel Micay wrote:
> On 04/01/15 04:05 PM, Christian Hesse wrote:
> I would create a wiki page with the list and then see if you can find a
> developer interested in mass-adding the missing signatures. I'd be
> interested in helping with it for [community], but you'll likely b
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 04:09:50AM -0500, Daniel Micay wrote:
> On 04/01/15 04:05 PM, Christian Hesse wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > pacman 4.2.0 gained support for verifying source tarballs with kernel.org
> > style signature. Some (even essential) packages could benefit from that,
> > linux
On 05/01/15 12:28 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:16:10AM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
>> I do not think we need HTTPS, though it does not hurt. If anybody tries to
>> fool us with man-in-the-middle via HTTP we should detect that just fine with
>> broken signatures (given sign
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:16:10AM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> I do not think we need HTTPS, though it does not hurt. If anybody tries to
> fool us with man-in-the-middle via HTTP we should detect that just fine with
> broken signatures (given signatures are provided...).
>
> Appending .sign m
> I do not think we need HTTPS, though it does not hurt. If anybody tries to
> fool us with man-in-the-middle via HTTP we should detect that just fine with
> broken signatures (given signatures are provided...).
Well, I mean when no signatures are available. It's not really that
common for upstrea
Daniel Micay on Mon, 2015/01/05 04:01:
> On 04/01/15 05:03 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 22:05:21 +0100
> > Christian Hesse wrote:
> >
> >> Hello everybody,
> >>
> >> pacman 4.2.0 gained support for verifying source tarballs with
> >> kernel.org style signature. Some (even essen
On 04/01/15 04:05 PM, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> pacman 4.2.0 gained support for verifying source tarballs with kernel.org
> style signature. Some (even essential) packages could benefit from that,
> linux and git come to mind.
>
> How to handle this? Report a bug for every pac
On 04/01/15 05:03 PM, Doug Newgard wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 22:05:21 +0100
> Christian Hesse wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> pacman 4.2.0 gained support for verifying source tarballs with
>> kernel.org style signature. Some (even essential) packages could
>> benefit from that, linux and git
Doug Newgard on Sun, 2015/01/04 16:03:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 22:05:21 +0100
> Christian Hesse wrote:
>
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > pacman 4.2.0 gained support for verifying source tarballs with
> > kernel.org style signature. Some (even essential) packages could
> > benefit from that, linux and
On Sun, 4 Jan 2015 22:05:21 +0100
Christian Hesse wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> pacman 4.2.0 gained support for verifying source tarballs with
> kernel.org style signature. Some (even essential) packages could
> benefit from that, linux and git come to mind.
>
> How to handle this? Report a bug
Hello everybody,
pacman 4.2.0 gained support for verifying source tarballs with kernel.org
style signature. Some (even essential) packages could benefit from that,
linux and git come to mind.
How to handle this? Report a bug for every package? Provide a list here?
--
main(a){char*c=/*Schoene
11 matches
Mail list logo
