On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 11:59:10PM +0100, Jan Steffens wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> > What I find surprising here is that
> >
> > 1. I never get to see the text, no matter what I do
> > 2. 'open' doesn't open but removes
> >
> > Is this weird behaviour unique
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> What I find surprising here is that
>
> 1. I never get to see the text, no matter what I do
> 2. 'open' doesn't open but removes
>
> Is this weird behaviour unique to my system, or is it just an area in
> serious need of improvement in Gnom
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> I've just changed my desktop back to Gnome3. I suspect that
> notifications are somewhat broken on my system, but I can't find any
> information to confirm it.
>
> When I run 'notify-send "Test notifications"' the following happens:
>
> 1.
I've just changed my desktop back to Gnome3. I suspect that
notifications are somewhat broken on my system, but I can't find any
information to confirm it.
When I run 'notify-send "Test notifications"' the following happens:
1. a small 'i' in a blue circle appears at the bottom of the screen
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Nephyrin Zey wrote:
> Gnome 3 is, frankly, not ready yet. It's a bit like the original KDE4
> situation - it has promise, but also serious rough edges (20% CPU usage when
> moving the mouse, complete no-go with binary nvidia drivers, ...),
I'm using the binary nv
On 04/10/2011 09:02 PM, Nephyrin Zey wrote:
I think removing Gnome2 from arch's repositories would be a mistake.
Even gentoo is maintaining gnome2 support until "At least Gnome 3.2".
If myself and others volunteered to help maintain a [gnome2] repo,
would it be considered for official mirrorage
2011/4/10 Nephyrin Zey :
> Gnome 3 is, frankly, not ready yet. It's a bit like the original KDE4
> situation - it has promise, but also serious rough edges (20% CPU usage when
> moving the mouse, complete no-go with binary nvidia drivers, ...), and is
> lacking basic features gnome 2 had. (sensors
Gnome 3 is, frankly, not ready yet. It's a bit like the original KDE4
situation - it has promise, but also serious rough edges (20% CPU usage
when moving the mouse, complete no-go with binary nvidia drivers, ...),
and is lacking basic features gnome 2 had. (sensors applet, startup
application m
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Tom wrote:
> So, now that Gnome 3 has been released, and after reading the announcement
> that
> it will 'by default' replace gnome2 in the near future, I'd like to ask if
> there are any plans on 'keeping' gnome2 around for use with arch linux.
>
> I ask this, be
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 13:47 +0200, Tom wrote:
> So, now that Gnome 3 has been released, and after reading the announcement
> that
> it will 'by default' replace gnome2 in the near future, I'd like to ask if
> there are any plans on 'keeping' gnome2 around for use with arch linux.
>
> I ask this,
So, now that Gnome 3 has been released, and after reading the announcement that
it will 'by default' replace gnome2 in the near future, I'd like to ask if
there are any plans on 'keeping' gnome2 around for use with arch linux.
I ask this, because I've been using gnome3 from the unstable repository
Good day mates.
Today I installed gnome3 with "pacman -S gnome-shell testing/gnome"
and I'm running it with startx using "exec ck-launch-session
gnome-session" on my .xinitrc. I got it working with a recently
created user (empty $HOME) but I can't however get it working with my
own user, all I get
12 matches
Mail list logo
