[2012-02-12 18:03:31 +0100] Alexander van den Berghe:
> I am not familiar with this particular case
> but judging on the previous messages 'active development' may be an
> overstatement for ffmpeg. Considering the current situation (again
> based on previous messages) this discussion is perfectly v
On 02/12/2012 05:47 PM, Jason Steadman wrote:
What is this? Everything is working fine as it is, ffmpeg isn't deprecated
and is under active development, why upset the apple cart? Please stop
"campaigning", I'm really not interested.
That it works fine for the moment does not mean it is the bes
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Jason Steadman wrote:
> Please stop
> "campaigning", I'm really not interested.
Please mute this thread.
@all
wonder is the ffmpeg maintainer so maybe he knows something we don't.
On the other hand, maintainers often settle for the "evil they know".
It's still u
What is this? Everything is working fine as it is, ffmpeg isn't deprecated
and is under active development, why upset the apple cart? Please stop
"campaigning", I'm really not interested.
--
Jason Steadman
On 12 February 2012 15:45, Andrea Crotti wrote:
> On 02/12/2012 12:20 AM, Jesse Jaara wrote:
>>
>> Dunno about mplater but mplayer2 uses lubav, but is conpitable with ffmpeg
>> after config script patch (version missmach)
>
>
> Yes exactly, I don't know many details myself but what I'm sure about
On 02/12/2012 12:20 AM, Jesse Jaara wrote:
Dunno about mplater but mplayer2 uses lubav, but is conpitable with ffmpeg
after config script patch (version missmach)
Yes exactly, I don't know many details myself but what I'm sure about
is that almost all the core developers switched to libav, and
Dunno about mplater but mplayer2 uses lubav, but is conpitable with ffmpeg
after config script patch (version missmach)
On 02/11/2012 12:55 PM, Andrea Crotti wrote:
On 02/11/2012 07:30 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 02/11/2012 09:26 PM, Andrea Crotti wrote:
I am not part of the libav team, but I know many developers and I
followed the story
of the fork.
I then also noticed that my beloved arch is still using ffmpeg an
On 02/11/2012 07:30 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 02/11/2012 09:26 PM, Andrea Crotti wrote:
I am not part of the libav team, but I know many developers and I
followed the story
of the fork.
I then also noticed that my beloved arch is still using ffmpeg and libav
is not even in
the official repository
On 02/11/2012 09:26 PM, Andrea Crotti wrote:
> I am not part of the libav team, but I know many developers and I
> followed the story
> of the fork.
> I then also noticed that my beloved arch is still using ffmpeg and libav
> is not even in
> the official repository (but only in AUR).
>
> Is there
I am not part of the libav team, but I know many developers and I
followed the story
of the fork.
I then also noticed that my beloved arch is still using ffmpeg and libav
is not even in
the official repository (but only in AUR).
Is there a reason for that?
There are quite a few good reasons
11 matches
Mail list logo
