On Monday 22 June 2009 03:13:41 am Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> I need to explain this a bit more:
>
>
> Now i cfdisk this device, are the nodes updated then?
> - I mean do i get the /dev/mapper/vidia_fffadgicp1 p2 p3 autimatically or
> do I need to run dmraid -ay for every partition i created?
> -
On Monday 22 June 2009 03:13:41 am Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> I need to explain this a bit more:
>
> If you start with empty disks, eg. 2 disks
> I put them together in bios of raid controller.
> After booting install media, which runs dmraid -ay during boot process, i
> get something like that:
>
On Monday 22 June 2009 03:16:15 am Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Just forgot one question, is /dev/sda also shown in /dev tree if dmraid is
> used?
> thanks
> greetings
> tpowa
They are all there:
[09:53 archangel:~] # l /dev/sd*
brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 0 2009-06-22 01:40 /dev/sda
brw-rw 1 ro
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 10:16 +0200, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Just forgot one question, is /dev/sda also shown in /dev tree if dmraid is
> used?
> thanks
> greetings
> tpowa
That looks logical to me. dmraid is just RAID using the devicemapper/lvm
subsystem. When I use LVM on a machine, I will get
Just forgot one question, is /dev/sda also shown in /dev tree if dmraid is
used?
thanks
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I need to explain this a bit more:
If you start with empty disks, eg. 2 disks
I put them together in bios of raid controller.
After booting install media, which runs dmraid -ay during boot process, i get
something like that:
/dev/mapper/nvidia_fffadgic
because no partitions are there.
Now i cfdi
On Monday 22 June 2009 02:14:15 am Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > So I guess I will have to edit all the scripts to put an extra 'p' in
> > them as well. (Really kind of a pain, but if this new scheme is going to
> > be the standard, I can do it, ...but if this is just a 'proposed' change,
> > th
> So I guess I will have to edit all the scripts to put an extra 'p' in
> them
> as well. (Really kind of a pain, but if this new scheme is going to be the
> standard, I can do it, ...but if this is just a 'proposed' change, then I
> would rather not.
>
> So is this Official? If so I d
On Sunday 21 June 2009 02:07:53 am Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am Sonntag 21 Juni 2009 schrieb David C. Rankin:
> > On Friday 19 June 2009 04:17:45 pm Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > > I put again a 1.0.0rc15 package to testing, i can't test it myself so i
> > > need you to help me on th
Works fine here; p's are required for me.
Bye
urs
On Friday 19 June 2009 23:17:45 Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I put again a 1.0.0rc15 package to testing, i can't test it myself so i
> need you to help me on this.
>
> Is it true that name scheme changed from:
> name1 to namep1 for parti
Am Sonntag 21 Juni 2009 schrieb David C. Rankin:
> On Friday 19 June 2009 04:17:45 pm Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > I put again a 1.0.0rc15 package to testing, i can't test it myself so i
> > need you to help me on this.
> >
> > Is it true that name scheme changed from:
> > name1 to nam
On Friday 19 June 2009 04:17:45 pm Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I put again a 1.0.0rc15 package to testing, i can't test it myself so i
> need you to help me on this.
>
> Is it true that name scheme changed from:
> name1 to namep1 for partitions?
> And how are your arrays named?
> Are your
On Friday 19 June 2009 08:15:58 pm Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > I put again a 1.0.0rc15 package to testing, i can't test it myself so i
> > need you to help me on this.
> >
> > Is it true that name scheme changed from:
> > name1 t
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I put again a 1.0.0rc15 package to testing, i can't test it myself so i need
> you to help me on this.
>
> Is it true that name scheme changed from:
> name1 to namep1 for partitions?
> And how are your arrays named?
> Are your a
Hi guys,
I put again a 1.0.0rc15 package to testing, i can't test it myself so i need
you to help me on this.
Is it true that name scheme changed from:
name1 to namep1 for partitions?
And how are your arrays named?
Are your arrays assembled correct?
Does everything work as before?
Thanks for hel
15 matches
Mail list logo
